Ward v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
63
RESPONSE to Motion re 61 MOTION to Compel MOTION for Sanctions and Motion to Amend or Clarify Its March 30, 2009 Order Regarding Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege filed by Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Order)(Babcock, Charles)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION JOHN WARD, JR. § § § § § §
v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
C. A. NO. 08-4022 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER DENYING WARD'S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH COURT'S MARCH 30, 2009 ORDER AND FOR SANCTIONS
The Court, having considered Ward's Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's March 30 2009 Order and for Sanctions, and any responses thereto in the above-referenced lawsuit, hereby ORDERS that: The Motion is DENIED. It is hereby ORDERED that Ward's Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's March 30 2009 Order and for Sanctions is DENIED.
5509840v.1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
