Luxpro Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 57

NOTICE (USCA) that a PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS has been filed as case number 09-3689, in the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals by Apple, Inc. for 50 Order on Motion to Transfer Case. (Attachments: # 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, # 2 Appendix of Exhibits to Petition, Part I, # 3 Appendix of Exhibits to Petition, Part II, # 4 Petitioner's Letter to 8USCA, # 5 Receipt of Payment by 8USCA)(cap)

Download PDF
Luxpro Corporation v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 57 Case:4:08-cv-04092-HFB Document 57 11/20/2009 Entry ID: 3607861 Case 09-3689 Page: 1 Date Filed: Filed 11/20/09 Page 1 of 4 United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov November 20, 2009 Mr. Kevin Arlen Crass FRIDAY & ELDREDGE 400 W. Capitol Avenue 2000 Regions Center Little Rock, AR 72201-0000 RE: 09-3689 Apple, Inc. v. Luxpro Corporation Dear Counsel: A petition for a writ has been filed under the referenced number. Receipt for docketing fee will be sent through the mail. The petition will be submitted to a panel of judges, and you will be advised of the Court's ruling. On June 1, 2007, the Eighth Circuit implemented the appellate version of CM/ECF. Electronic filing is now mandatory for attorneys and voluntary for pro se litigants proceeding without an attorney. Information about electronic filing can be found at www.ca8.uscourts.gov/files/cmecfstandingorder.pdf. In order to become an authorized Eighth Circuit filer, you must register with the PACER Service Center at https://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/psco/cgi-bin/cmecf/ea-regform.pl. Questions about CM/ECF may be addressed to the Clerk's office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court Enclosure(s) cc: Mr. Richard A. Adams Honorable Harry F. Barnes Mr. Phillip Nollin Cockrell Mr. Patrick J. Conroy Mr. Reid D. Davis Mr. Jeremy Hutchinson Mr. Glenn Edward Janik Mr. Christopher R. Johnson Mr. Corey Darnell McGaha Ms. Leisa B. Pearlman Mr. Stuart C. Plunkett Mr. James Marvin Pratt Jr. Ms. Penelope Preovolos District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:08-cv-04092-HFB Dockets.Justia.com Case:4:08-cv-04092-HFB Document 57 11/20/2009 Entry ID: 3607861 Case 09-3689 Page: 2 Date Filed: Filed 11/20/09 Page 2 of 4 Caption For Case Number: 09-3689 In re: Apple, Inc., formerly known as Apple Computer, Inc., Petitioner Case:4:08-cv-04092-HFB Document 57 11/20/2009 Entry ID: 3607861 Case 09-3689 Page: 3 Date Filed: Filed 11/20/09 Page 3 of 4 Addresses For Case Participants: 09-3689 Mr. Kevin Arlen Crass FRIDAY & ELDREDGE 400 W. Capitol Avenue 2000 Regions Center Little Rock, AR 72201-0000 Mr. Richard A. Adams PATTON & ROBERTS 2900 St. Michael Drive 400 Century Bank Plaza Texarkana, TX 75503-0000 Mr. Phillip Nollin Cockrell PATTON & ROBERTS 2900 St. Michael Drive 400 Century Bank Plaza Texarkana, TX 75503-0000 Mr. Patrick J. Conroy SHORE & CHAN 901 Main Street Suite 3300 Dallas, TX 75202 Mr. Reid D. Davis PATTON & ROBERTS 2900 St. Michael Drive 400 Century Bank Plaza Texarkana, TX 75503-0000 Mr. Jeremy Hutchinson PATTON & ROBERTS 111 Center Street Suite 1315 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Glenn Edward Janik SHORE & CHAN 901 Main Street Suite 3300 Dallas, TX 75202 Mr. Corey Darnell McGaha PATTON & ROBERTS 2900 St. Michael Drive 400 Century Bank Plaza Texarkana, TX 75503-0000 Case:4:08-cv-04092-HFB Document 57 11/20/2009 Entry ID: 3607861 Case 09-3689 Page: 4 Date Filed: Filed 11/20/09 Page 4 of 4 Ms. Leisa B. Pearlman PATTON & ROBERTS 2900 St. Michael Drive 400 Century Bank Plaza Texarkana, TX 75503-0000 Mr. Stuart C. Plunkett MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Mr. James Marvin Pratt Jr. BRAMBLETT & PRATT 146 Washington, N.W. P.O. Box 938 Camden, AR 71701-0938 Ms. Penelope Preovolos MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?