Log Cabin Republicans v. United States of America et al

Filing 193

NOTICE OF LODGING Proposed Pretrial Conference Order Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans, Defendants Donald H Rumsfeld, United States of America. (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Final Pretrial Conference Order)(Woods, Daniel)

Download PDF
Log Cabin Republicans v. United States of America et al Doc. 193 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAN WOODS (State Bar No. 78638) EARLE MILLER (State Bar No. 116864) AARON A. KAHN (State Bar No. 238505) WHITE & CASE LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 Telephone: (213) 620-7700 Facsimile: (213) 452-2329 E-mail: dwoods@whitecase.com E-mail: emiller@whitecase.com E-mail: aakahn@whitecase.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT M. GATES (substituted for Donald H. Rumsfeld pursuant to FRCP 25(d)), SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, in his official capacity, Defendants. Case No. ED CV 04-8425-VAP (Ex) NOTICE OF LODGING [PROPOSED] FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER Judge: Hon. Virginia A. Phillips Complaint filed: October 12, 2004 Trial Date: July 13, 2010 Pretrial Conf: June 28, 2010 2:30 p.m. -1LOSANGELES 870392 (2K) NOTICE OF LODGING [PROPOSED] FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED COURT: Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans and Defendants United States of America and Secretary of Defense give notice that, pursuant to L.R. 52-1, they are lodging with the Court the (Proposed) Final Pretrial Conference Order. Dated: June 21, 2010 Respectfully submitted, WHITE & CASE LLP /s/ Dan Woods Dan Woods Attorneys for Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans By: -2LOSANGELES 870392 (2K) NOTICE OF LODGING [PROPOSED] FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?