Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 258

NOTICE OF MOTION AND First MOTION for Review of Order re: Perfect 10's Motion To Compel Defendant Google Inc. To Produce Documents Pursuant to Perfect 10's Requests for Production Nos. 128-131, 174, and 194-196 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc.Motion set for hearing on 4/14/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick Regarding Google Inc.'s Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008#2 Exhibit Exhibit A to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick#3 Exhibit Exhibit B to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick#4 Exhibit Exhibit C to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick#5 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order Sustaining Google Inc.'s Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008)(Zeller, Michael)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [Consolidated with Case No. CV 054753 AHM (SHx)] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REVIEW OF NONDISPOSITIVE RULING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN Court: Hon. A. Howard Matz
*

10 PERFECT 10, INC., a California corporation, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 GOOGLE INC., a corporation; and 14 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 15 16 17 19 20 vs. Defendants. AND COUNTERCLAIM

PERFECT 10, INC., a California 18 corporation, Plaintiff,

21 AMAZON.COM, INC., a corporation; A9.COM, INC., a corporation; and 22 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 23 24 25 26 27 28
51320/2424738.1

Defendants.

Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [Consolidated with Case No. CV 05-4753 AHM (SHx)] [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME

1 2 4 2008. 5

Order WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Hillman issued his Order re Perfect 10's

3 Motion to Compel Defendant Google Inc. to Produce Documents on February 22, WHEREAS, under L.R. 72-2.1, the time for Perfect 10, Inc. ("Perfect

6 10") and/or Google Inc. ("Google") to file a motion for review of Magistrate Judge 7 Hillman's ruling is no later than March 7, 2008. 8 WHEREAS, the parties have mutually agreed to stipulate to an 9 extension of seven days of the deadline to file a motion for review of Magistrate 10 Judge Hillman's ruling. 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 DATED: March 7, 2008 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
51320/2424738.1

NOW THEREFORE, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that, to the 1. 2. 3. 4. Each party's Motion for Review shall be due on March 14, 2008. Each party's Opposition will be due on March 26, 2008. Each party's Reply will be due on April 4, 2008. The parties' Motions will be heard on April 14, 2008.

12 extent each party files a motion for review of Magistrate Judge Hillman's ruling:

A. Howard Matz United States District Judge

Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [Consolidated with Case No. CV 05-4753 AHM (SHx)] [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME

-2-