Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 904

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Quash Subpoena served by Perfect 10, Inc. on Ms. Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order filed by Defendant and Counter-Claimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/16/2010 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zeller, Michael)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) DISCOVERY MATTER [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO QUASH THE POOVALA SUBPOENAS AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER Hon. Stephen J. Hillman Date: August 16, 2010 Time: 2:00 p.m. Crtrm.: 550 Discovery Cutoff: None Set Pretrial Conference Date: None Set Trial Date: None Set 10 PERFECT 10, INC., a California corporation, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 GOOGLE INC., a corporation; and 14 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3548179.1 Defendants. AND COUNTERCLAIM [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO QUASH AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER This matter is before the Court on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Plaintiff 3 Perfect 10, Inc.'s ("P10") April 16, 2010 subpoenas directed to Ms. Shantal Rands 4 Poovala and for a Protective Order preventing their enforcement. Finding good 5 cause therefor, Google's Motion is hereby GRANTED. 6 The April 16, 2010 subpoenas directed to Ms. Shantal Rands Poovala are 7 hereby quashed and a protective order granted. Ms. Shantal Rands Poovala is 8 relieved of any obligation to respond to P10's subpoenas. 9 10 DATED: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3548179.1 , 2010 By Hon. Stephen J. Hillman United States Magistrate Judge [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO QUASH AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?