Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 915

STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Objections to and Motion for Review of Nondispositive Ruling of Magistrate Judge Hillman filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time)(Kassabian, Rachel)

Download PDF
1 (COUNSEL LISTED ON FOLLOWING PAGE) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR REVIEW OF NONDISPOSITIVE RULING BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN Court: Hon. A. Howard Matz [Proposed] Order Filed Concurrently Herewith 10 PERFECT 10, INC., a California corporation, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 GOOGLE INC., a corporation; and 14 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3555492.1 Defendants. AND COUNTERCLAIM Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR REVIEW OF NONDISPOSITIVE RULING BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417) michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 2 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 4 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 5 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 6 San Francisco, California 94111 Rachel Herrick Kassabian (Bar No. 191060) rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com 7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 8 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 9 10 THE LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER 11 Jeffrey N. Mausner (State Bar No. 122385) David N. Schultz (State Bar No. 123094) 12 Warner Center Towers 21800 Oxnard Street, Suite 910 13 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Telephone: 818-992-7500 14 Facsimile: 818-716-2773 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3555492.1 Attorneys for Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) -2STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR REVIEW OF NONDISPOSITIVE RULING BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN 1 WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Hillman issued his Order re Plaintiff Perfect 2 10's Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions on June 16, 2010, which Order was 3 electronically served upon the parties on June 17, 2010 (Docket No. 896); 4 6 WHEREAS, under L.R. 72-2.1, the time for Perfect 10 to file a motion for WHEREAS, on June 26, 2010, Perfect 10 informed Google via email that it 5 review of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order is no later than July 1, 2010; 7 intends to file objections to and a motion for review of certain aspects of Magistrate 8 Judge Hillman's Order; 9 WHEREAS, the parties have mutually agreed to extend the deadline and 10 briefing schedule pertaining to Perfect 10's objections and motion for review of 11 Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order; 12 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Google and Perfect 10, 13 through their counsel of record and subject to the Court's approval pursuant to L.R. 14 7-1, that the objections and briefing schedule for Perfect 10's motion for review of 15 Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order shall be as follows: 16 18 19 20 1. 2. 3. 4. Perfect 10's objections to and motion for review shall be filed and Google's opposition shall be filed and served on or before July 26, 2010. Perfect 10's reply shall be filed and served on or before August 2, 2010. The hearing on Perfect 10's objections and motion for review shall be 17 served on or before July 12, 2010. 21 set for August 16, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. (or such other date and time as may be 22 convenient for the Court). 23 24 DATED: June 28, 2010 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3555492.1 Respectfully Submitted, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP By Rachel Herrick Kassabian Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) -3STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR REVIEW OF NONDISPOSITIVE RULING BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN 1 2 DATED: June 28, 2010 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3555492.1 THE LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER By /s/ Jeffrey Mausner (with permission) Jeffrey N. Mausner Attorney for Plaintiff PERFECT 10, INC. Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) -4STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR REVIEW OF NONDISPOSITIVE RULING BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?