Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al
Filing
976
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Review of Magistrate Hillman's Order of August 10, 2010 On Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala re Order on Motion to Quash Subpoena, Telephone Conference,, #964 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 10/4/2010 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Hillman's Order of August 10, 2010 on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala [Public Redacted], #2 Declaration of Margret Caruso in Support of Google's Motion, #3 Proposed Order)(Caruso, Margret)
<![CDATA[
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al
Doc. 976 Att. 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PERFECT 10, INC., a California corporation, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 GOOGLE INC., a corporation; and 15 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
01980.51320/3648667.1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF AND OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE HILLMAN'S ORDER OF AUGUST 10, 2010 ON GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS TO SHANTAL RANDS POOVALA
Defendants. AND COUNTERCLAIM
Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR REVIEW Dockets.Justia.com
1 2
Order This matter is before the Court on Google Inc.'s ("Google") Objections to and
3 Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of August 10, 2010 4 Denying Google's Motion to Quash Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s ("P10") April 2010 5 subpoenas directed to Ms. Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order 6 preventing their enforcement. Finding good cause therefor, Google's Motion is 7 hereby GRANTED. 8 The April 2010 subpoenas directed to Ms. Shantal Rands Poovala are hereby 9 quashed and a protective order granted. Ms. Shantal Rands Poovala is relieved of 10 any obligation to respond to P10's subpoenas. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 DATED: August __, 2010 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
01980.51320/3648667.1
A. Howard Matz United States District Judge
Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR REVIEW
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
