Valueclick Inc v. Revenue Science Inc

Filing 35

EX PARTE APPLICATION to Exceed Page Limitation Revenue Science,Inc's Responsive Markman Brief filed by Defendant Revenue Science Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Subhedar, Nitin)

Valueclick Inc v. Revenue Science Inc

Doc. 35

1 ROBERT T. HASLAM (State Bar No. 71134) 2 NITIN SUBHEDAR (State Bar No. 171802) 3 BHANU K. SADASIVAN (State Bar No. 233429) 4 HELLER EHRMAN LLP

[e-mail]

[e-mail]

[e-mail] 275 Middlefield Road

5 Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506 6 Facsimile: [phone]

Telephone: [phone]

7 JOHN C. ULIN (State Bar No. 165524) 8 HELLER EHRMAN LLP th 10 Facsimile: [phone]

[e-mail]

9 Los Angeles, CA 90071-3043

333 South Hope Street, 39 Floor Telephone: [phone]

11 MATTHEW C. LAPPLE (State Bar No. 193546) 12 4350 La Jolla Village Drive, 7th Floor 13 Telephone: [phone]

[e-mail]

San Diego, CA 92122

Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant

15 REVENUE SCIENCE, INC. 16 17 18 19 20 21 a Delaware Corporation, 22 23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION VALUECLICK, INC., Case No.: CV 07 2052 MMM (JCX) Plaintiff, v. a Washington Corporation, DEFENDANT REVENUE SCIENCE, INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMIT

24 REVENUE SCIENCE, INC., 25 26 27
Heller Ehrman LLP

Defendant.

28
DEFENDANT REVENUE SCIENCE, INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMIT CASE NO. CV-07-2052 MMM (JCX) Dockets.Justia.com

1

Defendant Revenue Science, Inc. ("RSI") hereby applies to the Court ex parte

2 for an Order enlarging the page limit for RSI's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, 3 filed herewith. Such an increase in the page limit is necessary in order to address the 4 lengthy ValueClick's Opening Claim Construction Brief, which at 32 pages is 7 5 pages longer than the page limit of 25. RSI's Opening Claim Construction Brief, by 6 contrast, was within the page limit of 25. 7

RSI has meet and conferred with ValueClick and ValueClick has agreed to the

8 extension. 9

RSI has made every effort to shorten its Responsive Claim Construction Brief

10 and address only those issues not previously addressed in its Opening Brief. 11 However, ValueClick's inaccurate description of the patents-in-suit and the 12 applicable claim construction law has required RSI to address these issues more 13 extensively in its Responsive Claim Construction Brief. Accordingly, RSI 14 respectfully requests that the Court permit RSI to enlarge the page limit of its 15 Responsive Claim Construction Brief to 31. 16 17 Dated: November 19, 2007 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Heller Ehrman LLP

HELLER EHRMAN LLP

By /s/Nitin Subhedar Nitin Subhedar Attorneys for Defendant Revenue Science, Inc.

28 1
DEFENDANT REVENUE SCIENCE, INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMIT CASE NO. CV-07-2052 MMM (JCX)