Valueclick Inc v. Revenue Science Inc

Filing 39

NOTICE OF LODGING filed (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Subhedar, Nitin)

Download PDF
Valueclick Inc v. Revenue Science Inc Doc. 39 1 ROBERT T. HASLAM (State Bar No. 71134) 2 NITIN SUBHEDAR (State Bar No. 171802) 3 BHANU K. SADASIVAN (State Bar No. 233429) 4 HELLER EHRMAN LLP robert.haslam@hellerehrman.com nitin.subhedar@hellerehrman.com bhanu.sadasivan@hellerehrman.com 275 Middlefield Road 5 Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506 6 Facsimile: (650) 324-0638 Telephone: (650) 324-7000 7 JOHN C. ULIN (State Bar No. 165524) 8 HELLER EHRMAN LLP th 10 Facsimile: (213) 614-1868 john.ulin@hellerehrman.com 9 Los Angeles, CA 90071-3043 333 South Hope Street, 39 Floor Telephone: (213) 689-0200 11 MATTHEW C. LAPPLE (State Bar No. 193546) 12 4350 La Jolla Village Drive, 7th Floor 13 Telephone: (858) 450-8401 14 matt.lapple@hellerehrman.com San Diego, CA 92122 Facsimile: (858) 587-5953 Attorneys for Defendant 15 REVENUE SCIENCE, INC. 16 17 18 19 20 21 a Delaware Corporation, 22 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION VALUECLICK, INC., Case No.: CV 07 2052 MMM (JCX) Plaintiff, v. a Washington Corporation, REVENUE SCIENCE, INC.'S NOTICE OF LODGING 24 REVENUE SCIENCE, INC., 25 26 27 Heller Ehrman LLP Defendant. 28 REVENUE SCIENCE, INC.'S NOTICE OF LODGING CASE NO. CV-07-2052 MMM (JCX) Dockets.Justia.com 1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Revenue Science, Inc. hereby 2 lodges with the Court a [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANT REVENUE 3 SCIENCE, INC.'S ex parte application to enlarge page limit. 4 5 DATED: November 20, 2007 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Heller Ehrman LLP HELLER EHRMAN LLP By ____\s\ Nitin Subhedar___________ Nitin Subhedar ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT Revenue Science, Inc. 28 1 REVENUE SCIENCE, INC.'S NOTICE OF LODGING CASE NO. CV-07-2052 MMM (JCX)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?