Federal Trade Commission v. Burnlounge Inc et al
Filing
573
AMENDMENT TO FINAL JUDGMENT (#474) by Judge George H. Wu, Related to: Judgment, 474 1. The Amended Final Judgment (Docket No. 474), which is attached asAttachment A, shall remain in full force and effect, except as expressly superseded, altered, or modified herein 2. Page 8, lines 5-7 of the Amended Final Judgment is modified so that the number sixteen million two hundred forty-five thousand seven hundred ninetyninedollars and seventy cents ($16,245,799.70) is deleted and, in its place ,replaced with sixteen million two hundred forty six thousand nine hundred andfifteen dollars and seventy five cents ($16,246,915.75) as the amount of themonetary award as against Defendants BurnLounge and Arnold, jointly andseverally.3. Page 9, lines 2-3 of the Amended Final Judgment is modified so that thenumber one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) is deleted and, in itsplace, replaced with nine hundred and eight thousand two hundred and sixty threedollars and fifty cents ($908,263.50) as the amount of the monetary award asagainst Defendant DeBoer. (pj) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/22/2014: # 1 Amended Order) (jag).
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BURNLOUNGE, INC., a
)
corporation: JUAN ALEXANDER )
ARNOLD, an individual; JOHN
)
TAYLOR, an individual; ROB
)
DEBOER, an individual; and SCOTT )
ELLIOTT, an individual,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. CV 07-3654-GW
AMENDMENT TO FINAL
JUDGMENT (#474)
On March 1, 2012, this Court entered its “Amended Final Judgment”
18
(Docket No. 474) (the “Amended Final Judgment”), which such Amended Final
19
Judgment was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit;
20
On June 2, 2014, the Ninth Circuit issued an unpublished memorandum
21
opinion in which, inter alia, certain issues were remanded to this Court for further
22
consideration (the “Remanded Issues”) (Docket No. 555, at pp. 28-35);
23
This Court, after considering the parties’ respective positions and contentions
24
regarding the Remanded Issues, entered an Order dated September 22, 2014
25
(Docket No. 567) (the “Order on Remanded Issues”);
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] AMENDMENT TO FINAL JUDGMENT
1
Based on the record established in this matter and for reasons set forth in the
2
Order on Remanded Issues, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
3
DECREED, as follows:
4
1. The Amended Final Judgment (Docket No. 474), which is attached as
5
Attachment A, shall remain in full force and effect, except as expressly superseded,
6
altered, or modified herein.
7
2. Page 8, lines 5-7 of the Amended Final Judgment is modified so that the
8
number “sixteen million two hundred forty-five thousand seven hundred ninety-
9
nine dollars and seventy cents ($16,245,799.70)” is deleted and, in its place,
10
replaced with “sixteen million two hundred forty six thousand nine hundred and
11
fifteen dollars and seventy five cents ($16,246,915.75)” as the amount of the
12
monetary award as against Defendants BurnLounge and Arnold, jointly and
13
severally.
14
3. Page 9, lines 2-3 of the Amended Final Judgment is modified so that the
15
number “one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00)” is deleted and, in its
16
place, replaced with “nine hundred and eight thousand two hundred and sixty three
17
dollars and fifty cents ($908,263.50)” as the amount of the monetary award as
18
against Defendant DeBoer.
19
DATED: October 21, 2014
20
21
22
Hon. George H. Wu
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] AMENDMENT TO FINAL JUDGMENT
2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?