UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 587

Attachment 1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs (REDACTED) filed by Defendant Veoh Networks, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/14/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ranahan, Erin)

Download PDF
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al Doc. 587 Att. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA:259966.1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) VEOH NETWORKS, INC. a California ) Corporation, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. CV 07 5744 ­ AHM (AJWx) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VEOH NETWORKS INC.'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS Judge: Hon. A. Howard Matz Date: December 14, 2009 Time: 10:00 a.m. Ctrm: 14 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VEOH'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS Case No. CV 07 5744 ­ AHM (AJWx) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Motion of Veoh Networks, Inc. ("Veoh") for attorneys' fees and costs was heard on December 14, 2009, in Courtroom 14 of the above-referenced court. The Honorable Judge A. Howard Matz presided. Having considered all papers, pleadings and evidence submitted and the oral arguments presented, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. 2. 3. Veoh's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs is GRANTED; and Veoh his hereby awarded a total of $4,613,062.20, in fees and Veoh is hereby awarded 2,859,073.40 in fees, and $170,627.78 in $204,530.11 in costs pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505; and/or costs pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated: ___________________ Hon. A. Howard Matz [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VEOH'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS Case No. CV 07 5744 ­ AHM (AJWx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?