UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 606

Attachment 30
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs (REDACTED) 587 filed by Plaintiffs Songs of Universal, Inc., Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Rondor Music International, Inc., Universal Music - MGB NA LLC, UMG Recordings, Inc., Universal Music - Z Tunes LLC, Universal Music - MBG Music Publishing Ltd., Universal Music Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Brian D. Ledahl in Support of UMG's Opposition, # 2 Exhibit A to Ledahl Decl., # 3 Exhibit B to Ledahl Decl., # 4 Exhibit C to Ledahl Decl., # 5 Exhibit D to Ledahl Decl., # 6 Exhibit E to Ledahl Decl., # 7 Exhibit F to Ledahl Decl., # 8 Exhibit G to Ledahl Decl., # 9 Exhibit H to Ledahl Decl., # 10 Exhibit I to Ledahl Decl., # 11 Exhibit J to Ledahl Decl., # 12 Exhibit K to Ledahl Decl., # 13 Exhibit L to Ledahl Decl., # 14 Exhibit M to Ledahl Decl., # 15 Declaration Carter R. Batsell in Support of UMG's Opposition, # 16 Exhibit A to Batsell Decl., # 17 Exhibit B to Batsell Decl., # 18 Exhibit C to Batsell Decl., # 19 Exhibit D to Batsell Decl., # 20 Exhibit E to Batsell Decl., # 21 Exhibit F to Batsell Decl., # 22 Exhibit G to Batsell Decl., # 23 Exhibit H to Batsell Decl., # 24 Exhibit I to Batsell Decl., # 25 Exhibit J to Batsell Decl., # 26 Exhibit K to Batsell Decl., # 27 Exhibit L to Batsell Decl., # 28 Exhibit M to Batsell Decl., # 29 Exhibit N to Batsell Decl., # 30 Exhibit O to Batsell Decl., # 31 Exhibit P to Batsell Decl.)(Batsell, Carter)

Download PDF
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al Doc. 606 Att. 30 Case 2:07-cv-05744-AHM-AJW Document 271 Filed 12/05/2008 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL Case No. CV 07-5744 AHM (AJWx) Date: December 5, 2008 Title: UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al. v. VEOH NETWORKS, INC., et al. =================================================================== PRESENT: HON. ANDREW J. WISTRICH, MAGISTRATE JUDGE Ysela Benavides Deputy Clerk ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: None Present Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None Present ORDER REGARDING VEOH'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFFS SHOULD NOT BE FOUND IN CONTEMPT FOR REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 20, 2008 ORDER The ex parte application is denied without prejudice to its renewal on the basis of a more adequate record (that is, a topic-by-topic explanation of exactly how Veoh contends that UMG's compliance with Veoh's Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition notice is lacking) after compliance with Local Rule 37. Further, this is not an emergency warranting an ex parte application. See Mission Power Eng'g Co. v. Continental Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 488 (C.D. Cal. 1995). IT IS SO ORDERED. cc: Parties MINUTES FORM 11 CIVIL-GEN Initials of Deputy Clerk________ Exhibit O Page 46 ockets.Justia.com D

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?