Mark Mishak v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 9

Attachment 1
FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Lycos, Inc. answer now due 3/20/2008, filed by Defendant Lycos, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Page, Michael)

Download PDF
Mark Mishak v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 9 Att. 1 Case 2:07-cv-08258-CAS-JCR Document 9-2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Defendant LYCOS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SANTA ANA DIVISION MARK MISHAK, dba INEEDATV.COM, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., AMERICAN ONLINE, INC., NETSCAPE, INC., MICROSOFT NETWORK, INC., ASK JEEVES, INC. EXCITE, INC., WEBCRAWLER, INC., YAHOO, INC., CONVERSA, INC., LYCOS, INC., HOTBOT INC., ALTAVISTA INC., CRAIGSLIST INC., RESPOND INC., INFOSEEK INC., YELLOW PAGES INC., PLANETSEARCH INC., PRONET INC., NORTHERNLIGHT INC., LUCKYSURF INC., COMFIND INC., LIQUIDPRICE INC., EARTHLINK INC., DOES 1-100, Defendants. Case No. CV07-8258 CAS (JCRx) [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Judge: The Honorable Christina A. Snyder Date Comp. Filed: December 20, 2007 ORDER Pursuant to Stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Defendant LYCOS, INC. to answer or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint is extended up to and including March 20, 2008. /// /// 1 411326.01 [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING TIME CASE NO. CV07-8258 CAS (JCRx) Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-08258-CAS-JCR Document 9-2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: IT IS SO ORDERED. By: __________________________________ Hon. Christina A. Snyder United States District Judge 2 411326.01 [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING TIME CASE NO. CV07-8258 CAS (JCRx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?