Sean David Morton et al v. Bennett Ellenbogen et al

Filing 10

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Or In The Alternative For A More Definite Statement; Memorandum of Points and Authorities with proof of service filed by Defendants Bennett Ellenbogen, Tim Johnson, Eric Holder, Jr, Thomas P. O'Brien. Motion set for hearing on 6/15/2009 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Park, Richard)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAILING I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. I am employed by the Office of United States Attorney, My business address is 300 North Central District of California. Los Angeles Street, Suite 7516, Los Angeles, California 90012. On May 18, 2009 served NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF DEFENDANTS FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT on persons or entities named below by enclosing a copy in an envelope addressed as shown below and placing the envelope for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary office practices. I am readily familiar with the practice of this office for collection and processing collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business within the United States Postal Service in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. Date of mailing: May 18, 2009. Place of mailing: Los Angeles, California. Person(s) and/or Entity(is) To Whom Mailed: Sean David Morton and Melissa Morton 2207 Hermosa Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the forgoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. Executed on May 18, 2009 at Los Angeles, California. /s/ LYNN DUONG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?