Wachovia Mortgage FSB v. Abel Flores et al
Filing
7
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge George H Wu: Proceedings: Order Remanding Action to State Court. Defendant has failed to meet his burden of showing that federal question or diversity jurisdiction exists. The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and hereby remands this action to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Case number 09 U11841. The February 4, 2010, Scheduling Conference is vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 CV 103) (mg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3535
WESTERN DIVISION
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4750
SOUTHERN DIVISION
District Court Executive and Clerk of Court
TERRY NAFISI
February 2, 2010
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450
EASTERN DIVISION
Los Angeles County Superior Court Clerk of the Court 111 N. Hill Street Los Angeles, CA 90012
Re: Case Number: CV 09-09297 GW (CWx) Previously Superior Court Case No. 09 U11841 Case Name: WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB v. ABEL FLORES, ET AL., Dear Sir / Madam: Pursuant to this Court's ORDER OF REMAND issued on above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
February 2, 2010
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this Court. Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to our office. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Clerk, U. S. District Court By: Madelina Guerrero Deputy Clerk
cc: Counsel of record
213-894-2053
G Western $
G Eastern
G Southern Division
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein. Clerk, Superior Court Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
By:
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?