Association For Information Mediat and Equipment et al v. The Regents of The University of California et al

Filing 17

Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File as to MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim 16 filed by Defendants Gene Block, The Regents of The University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Slaughter, R)

1 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065
2 [e-mail]
R. JAMES SLAUGHTER - #192813
3 [e-mail]
MICHAEL S. KWUN - #198945
4 [e-mail]
ANDREW F. DAWSON - #264421
5 [e-mail]
710 Sansome Street
6 San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
T: 415-391-5400/F: 415-397-7188
7
8 JONATHAN BAND - #122369
[e-mail]
9 21 Dupont Circle NW, 8th Floor
Washington, DC 20036
10 T: 202-296-5675/F: 202-872-0884
11
12
13

CHARLES F. ROBINSON - #113197
[e-mail]
KAREN J. PETRULAKIS - #168732
[e-mail]
ERIC K. BEHRENS - #79440
[e-mail]
University of California
Office of the General Counsel
1111 Franklin Street, 8th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607-5200
T: 510-987-9800/F: 510-987-9757

Attorneys for Defendants
14 The Regents of the University of California
and Dr. Gene Block
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION
MEDIA AND EQUIPMENT, an
Illinois nonprofit membership
organization; and AMBROSE VIDEO
PUBLISHING, INC., a New York
corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a
California corporation; DR. GENE
BLOCK, CHANCELLOR OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
LOS ANGELES, an individual,
Defendants.

Case No. 10-cv-09378 CBM (MANx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT
STIPULATION REGARDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
MOTION TO DISMISS
Dept:
Judge:

Courtroom 2
Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall

Date Comp. Filed: December 7, 2010
Trial Date: Not Yet Set

27
28
541258.01

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-cv-09378 CBM (MANx)

1

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, the Court

2 hereby by Orders that:
3

1. Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be

4 filed on or before February 21, 2011.
5

2. Defendants’ reply brief in support of its motion to dismiss shall be

6 filed on or before March 7, 2011.
7

3. The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be March 14,

8 2011 at 11:00 a.m.
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 Dated:
12

By: _________________________

13

HON. CONSUELA MARSHALL
Judge of the United States
District Court

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
541258.01

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-cv-09378 CBM (MANx)