Association For Information Mediat and Equipment et al v. The Regents of The University of California et al

Filing 22

Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Amended Complaint and Subsequent Briefing Schedule filed by Defendants Gene Block(Chancellor of the University of California Los Angeles, an individual), Gene Block(an individual), Sharon Farb, Larry Loeher, Patricia O'Donnell, The Regents of The University of California, Mark G Yudof. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Slaughter, R)

1 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065
2 [e-mail]
R. JAMES SLAUGHTER - #192813
3 [e-mail]
MICHAEL S. KWUN - #198945
4 [e-mail]
ANDREW F. DAWSON - #264421
5 [e-mail]
710 Sansome Street
6 San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
T: 415-391-5400/F: 415-397-7188
7
JONATHAN BAND - #122369
8 [e-mail]
21 Dupont Circle NW, 8th Floor
9 Washington, DC 20036
T: 202-296-5675/F: 202-872-0884
10
11
12
13 Attorneys for Defendants

CHARLES F. ROBINSON - #113197
[e-mail]
KAREN J. PETRULAKIS - #168732
[e-mail]
ERIC K. BEHRENS - #79440
[e-mail]
University of California
Office of the General Counsel
1111 Franklin Street, 8th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607-5200
T: 510-987-9800/F: 510-987-9757

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION
MEDIA AND EQUIPMENT, an
Illinois nonprofit membership
organization; and AMBROSE VIDEO
PUBLISHING, INC., a New York
corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a
California corporation; MARK G.
YUDOF, an individual; DR. GENE
BLOCK, CHANCELLOR OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
LOS ANGELES, an individual; DR.
SHARON FARB, an individual;
LARRY LOEHER, an individual;
PATRICIA O’DONNELL, an
individual; and John Does 1-50,
Defendants.

Case No. 10-cv-09378 CBM (MANx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT
STIPULATION REGARDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
SUBSEQUENT BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
Dept:
Judge:

Courtroom 2
Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall

Date Comp. Filed: December 7, 2010
Trial Date: Not Yet Set

28
545719.01

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION
CASE NO. 10-cv-09378 CBM (MANx)

1

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, the Court

2 hereby by Orders that:
3

1. Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint will be

4 due March 14, 2011.
5

2. In the event that Defendants choose to file a motion to dismiss,

6 Plaintiffs’ opposition brief will be due April 4, 2011.
7

3. Defendants’ reply brief will be due April 18, 2011.

8

4. The hearing on any such motion to dismiss will take place on

9 Monday, May 2, 2011, at 11:00 A.M.
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 Dated:
13

By: _________________________

14

HON. CONSUELA MARSHALL
Judge of the United States District Court

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
545719.01

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION
CASE NO. 10-cv-09378 CBM (MANx)