George Clinton v. Will Adams et al

Filing 52

REQUEST to Substitute attorney Allen B. Grodsky in place of attorney Kara E. F. Cenar filed by Defendant Allan Pineda. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Request for Approval on Substitution of Attorney)(Grodsky, Allen)

Download PDF
ALLEN B. GRODSKY (SBN 111064) GRODSKY & OLECKI LLP 2001 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 210 Santa Monica, CA 90403 310.315.3009 (phone) 310.315.1557 (fax) allen@grodsky-olecki.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NUMBER GEORGE CLINTON, an individual, CV 10 9476 ODW PLAx Plaintiff(s) v. WILL ADAMS, p/k/a will.i.am individually and dba will.i.am music publishing, et al. ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY Defendant(s). The Court hereby orders that the request of: G Plaintiff Allan Pineda : Defendant G Other Name of Party Allen B. Grodsky of Grodsky & Olecki LLP to substitute : Retained Counsel who is G Counsel appointed by the Court (Criminal cases only) G Pro Se 2001 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 210, Santa Monica, CA 90403 Street Address Santa Monica, CA 90403 allen@grodsky-olecki.com City, State, Zip E-Mail Address 310.315.3009 310.315.1557 111064 Telephone Number Fax Number State Bar Number as attorney of record in place and stead of Kara E.F.Cenar Present Attorney is hereby G GRANTED G DENIED Dated U. S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge NOTICE TO COUNSEL : IF YO U AR E C U R R EN TLY EN R OLLED IN TH E OPTIC A L SC A N N IN G P R O G R A M A N D H AVE C H A NGED YO U R E - M A IL AD D R ESS SIN C E YO U R EN RO LLM EN T , YO U M UST C O M PLETE A N EN ROLLM EN T /UPD A TE FO R M ( G -76) T O E N SU R E TH A T D O C UM ENTS AR E SER VED A T TH E PR O PER E - M A IL A D D R ESS . TH IS FO RM , A S W ELL A S INFO R M A TION A BO U T THE O PTIC A L SC A N N IN G PR O G R A M IS A VA IL A B L E O N TH E C O U R T ā€™ S W EBSITE AT W W W . C A C D . U SC OU RTS . GOV . Gā€“01 ORDER (06/05) ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?