George Clinton v. Will Adams et al
Filing
54
REQUEST to Substitute attorney Allen B. Grodsky in place of attorney Kara E.F. Cenar filed by Defendant Will Adams. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney)(Grodsky, Allen)
ALLEN B. GRODSKY (SBN 111064)
GRODSKY & OLECKI LLP
2001 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 210
Santa Monica, CA 90403
310.315.3009 (phone)
310.315.1557 (fax)
allen@grodsky-olecki.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NUMBER
GEORGE CLINTON, an individual,
CV 10 9476 ODW PLAx
Plaintiff(s)
v.
WILL ADAMS, p/k/a will.i.am individually
and dba will.i.am music publishing, et al.
ORDER ON
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
Defendant(s).
The Court hereby orders that the request of:
G Plaintiff
Will Adams
: Defendant
G Other
Name of Party
Allen B. Grodsky of Grodsky & Olecki LLP
to substitute
: Retained Counsel
who is
G Counsel appointed by the Court (Criminal cases only)
G Pro Se
2001 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 210, Santa Monica, CA 90403
Street Address
Santa Monica, CA 90403
allen@grodsky-olecki.com
City, State, Zip
E-Mail Address
310.315.3009
310.315.1557
111064
Telephone Number
Fax Number
State Bar Number
as attorney of record in place and stead of
Kara E.F.Cenar
Present Attorney
is hereby
G GRANTED
G DENIED
Dated
U. S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge
NOTICE TO COUNSEL : IF YO U AR E C U R R EN TLY EN R OLLED IN TH E OPTIC A L SC A N N IN G P R O G R A M A N D H AVE
C H A NGED YO U R E - M A IL AD D R ESS SIN C E YO U R EN RO LLM EN T , YO U M UST C O M PLETE A N EN ROLLM EN T /UPD A TE FO R M
( G -76) T O E N SU R E TH A T D O C UM ENTS AR E SER VED A T TH E PR O PER E - M A IL A D D R ESS . TH IS FO RM , A S W ELL A S
INFO R M A TION A BO U T THE O PTIC A L SC A N N IN G PR O G R A M IS A VA IL A B L E O N TH E C O U R T ā S W EBSITE AT
W W W . C A C D . U SC OU RTS . GOV .
Gā01 ORDER (06/05)
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?