George Clinton v. Will Adams et al

Filing 68

STIPULATION to AMEND Scheduling Order, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,,,,,, 38 filed by Defendant Will Adams. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order granting Stipulation)(Grodsky, Allen)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JEFFREY P. THENNISCH (Michigan Bar Number P51499) (appearing Pro Hac Vice) jeff@patentco.com DOBRUSIN THENNISCH PC 29 West Lawrence Street, Suite 210 Pontiac, Michigan 48342 Telephone: (248) 292-2920 Facsimile: (248) 292-2910 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff GEORGE CLINTON 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 GEORGE CLINTON, an individual, Case No. CV 10-09476-ODW-PLA 13 Plaintiff, The Honorable Otis D. Wright II 14 15 16 17 v. WILL ADAMS, p/k/a will.i.am individually and d/b/a will.i.am music publishing , et al., 18 19 Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR (1) 30 DAY EXTENSION OF DATES IN SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AND (2) 30 DAY STAY OF DISCOVERY Action Filed: December 10, 2010 20 21 22 23 After reviewing the stipulation filed by Plaintiff and Defendants and for good 24 25 cause shown therein, the Court hereby orders: 26 (1) Discovery is stayed for 30 days from the date of this Order; and 27 (2) The dates in the Scheduling & Case Management Order are amended as 28 follows: - 1 – Proposed Order 1 Jury Trial June 5, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. 2 Last day to file Final Pretrial Ex. Stip. May 25, 2012 3 Hearing on motion in limine May 21, 2012 at 2:30 p.m. 4 Pre-trial Conference May 7, 2012 at 2:30 p.m. 5 Last day to lodge proposed PTO, etc. April 30, 2012 6 Last day for hearing on motions April 9, 2012 7 Last day to conduct settlement conference April 2, 2012 8 Discovery Cut-Off February 29, 2012 9 10 11 12 13 Date: Honorable Otis D. Wright II United States District Judge Central District of California 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 2 – Proposed Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?