Tarikh Demekpe v. California State University Dominguez Hills et al

Filing 21

NOTICE OF MOTION AND First MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Genuine Issue of Material Fact filed by defendant Board of Trustees of The California State University. Motion set for hearing on 11/21/2011 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (At tachments: # 1 Statement of Uncontroverted Facts, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Summary Judgment, # 3 Proposed Judgment, # 4 Declaration Declaration of Ginger Wilson, # 5 Declaration Declaration of Anupama Joshi, # 6 Declarat ion Declaration of Dr. Clarence "Gus" Martin, # 7 Declaration Declaration of Dr. S. Noel Sturm, # 8 Declaration Declaration of Dr. William R. Whetstone, # 9 Declaration Declaration of Dr. Miguel Dominguez, # 10 Declaration Declaration of Susan Westover, # 11 Exhibit Exhibits in Support of MSJ, Volume I, # 12 Exhibit Exhibits in Support of MSJ, Volume II, # 13 Exhibit Exhibits in Support of MSJ, Volume III)(Westover, Susan)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL Christine Helwick (SBN 057274) Susan Westover (SBN 151211) 401 Golden Shore, 4th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4210 Tel.: (562) 951-4500 Fax: (562) 951-4956 swestover@calstate.edu Attorneys for Defendant Board of Trustees of the California State University 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TARIKH DEMEKPE, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 vs. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. 16 17 Case No. CV11-1177 DDP (MLG) Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: November 21, 2011 10:00 a.m. 3 Hon. Dean D. Pregerson DECLARATION OF SUSAN WESTOVER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT CSU'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Date of Filing: Trial Date: February 23, 2011 Not Set 18 19 I, Susan Westover, declare as follow: 20 1. I am an attorney who is licensed to practice in California and am admitted 21 to the Central District. I am employed as University Counsel at CSU’s Office of 22 General Counsel. I am the attorney handling the defense of this case. 23 2. On July 18, 2011, my office served CSU’s request for production of 24 documents to plaintiff Tarikh Demekpe. A true and correct copy of that request is 25 submitted as CSU’s Exhibit 57. 26 3. On September 5, 2011, plaintiff served his written response to CSU’s 27 request for production of documents. A true and correct copy of that response, as well 28 as the image of the envelope in which it arrived, is submitted as CSU’s Exhibit 58. -1- MSJ: DEC. OF SUSAN WESTOVER Case No.: CV11-1177 DDP (MLG) 1 4. Before and after plaintiff served his written response to the request for 2 production, he randomly mailed me six sets of documents he was intending to produce 3 in response to CSU’s request for production. A true and correct copy of the first set of 4 documents, including the image of the envelope in which it arrived, is submitted as 5 CSU’s Exhibit 59. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 5. A true and correct copy of the second set of documents, including the image of the envelope in which it arrived, is submitted as CSU’s Exhibit 60. 6. A true and correct copy of the third set of documents, including the image of the envelope in which it arrived, is submitted as CSU’s Exhibit 61. 7. A true and correct copy of the fourth set of documents, including the image of the envelope in which it arrived, is submitted as CSU’s Exhibit 62. 8. A true and correct copy of the fifth set of documents, including the image of the envelope in which it arrived, is submitted as CSU’s Exhibit 63. 9. A true and correct copy of the sixth set of documents, including the image of the envelope in which it arrived, is submitted as CSU’s Exhibit 64. 10. Mr. Demekpe also made an informal production of documents earlier in 17 this case, when we met in person to exchange documents and attempt informal 18 resolution of this matter. True and correct copies of the four emails he informally 19 produced to me in person when we met are collectively submitted as Exhibit 65. 20 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that 21 this declaration is true and correct. Signed on October 12, 2011, at Long Beach, 22 California. 23 24 Susan Westover 25 26 27 28 -2- MSJ: DEC. OF SUSAN WESTOVER Case No.: CV11-1177 DDP (MLG) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Demekpe v. Board of Trustees of the California State University U.S. District Court Case No.: CV11-1177 DDP (MLG) OGC No.: 11-0186 I, Jason T. Taylor, declare as follows: I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am at least 18 years old, and not a party to this action. I am an employee of California State University, Office of General Counsel, whose business address is 401 Golden Shore, 4th Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802-4210. 8 9 10 11 12 On October 17, 2011, I served the document described as DECLARATION OF SUSAN WESTOVER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT CSU’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT on the interested parties in this action as follows: Tarikh Demekpe 688 Caliburn Drive, #24 Los Angeles, CA 90001 Plaintiff In Pro Per tdemekpe@toromail.csudh.edu Tel: (323) 572-1774 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 BY MAIL—COLLECTION BOX: I placed each document in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, in the California State University Office of General Counsel’s mail collection box in Long Beach, California, so that following ordinary business practices, the envelope would be collected and mailed on this date. I am readily familiar with this office's business practice for collection and processing of mail. In the ordinary course of business, each document would be deposited with the United States Postal Service on that same day. BY E-MAIL: I served each document on the parties by emailing each document in PDF format to each email address listed above. Each e-mail was successfully sent via CSU’s email server. Signed on October 17, 2011, at Long Beach, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that this declaration is true and correct. 24 Jason T. Taylor 25 26 27 28 MSJ: DEC. OF SUSAN WESTOVER Case No.: CV11-1177 DDP (MLG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?