Camelot Distribution Group, Inc. v. Does

Filing 11

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Hearing Expedite Discovery filed by Plaintiff Camelot Distribution Group, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 3/30/2011 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibit A - Plamondon Decl., # 4 Exhibit B - Plamondon Decl., # 5 Exhibit C - Plamondon Decl., # 6 Proposed Order)(Plamondon, Scott)

Camelot Distribution Group, Inc. v. Does

Doc. 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 weintraub genshlea chediak 11 12 13 14
LAW CORPORATION

Scott Hervey, State Bar No. 180188 Scott M. Plamondon, State Bar No. 212294

weintraub genshlea chediak
a law corporation

400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 [phone] ­ Main [phone] ­ Facsimile Attorneys for Plaintiff Camelot Distribution Group, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

CAMELOT DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, vs. DOES 1 through 5865, inclusive, Defendants.

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No.: CV11-01949 DDP (FMOx) PLAINTIFF CAMELOT DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Hearing Date: Time: Place: March 30, 2011 10:00 a.m. 312 N. Spring St. Los Angeles, CA 90012

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 26(d)(1), on March 30, 2011, at 10:00 A.M., plaintiff Camelot Distribution Group, Inc. ("Camelot" or "Plaintiff) will appear ex parte before Magistrate Judge Honorable Fernando M. Olguin in the United States District Court, Central District of California, Western Division, Room 901 F, to seek an order granting expedited discovery so that Plaintiff may serve subpoenas on DOE Defendants' Internet Service Providers ("ISP") to discover the true names and identities of each individual DOE Defendant. /// 1
Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery CV11-01949 DDP (FMOx)

{1295703.DOC;}

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 weintraub genshlea chediak 11 12 13 14
LAW CORPORATION

Camelot applies for such an order on the grounds that: (1) Camelot has learned of DOE Defendants' individual Internet Protocol ("IP") addresses which can be used to identify each DOE Defendant by name; (2) information connected to these IP addresses cannot be released by DOE Defendants' Internet Service Providers without subpoenas under Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 45; (3) discovery is necessary to ascertain the names of each individual DOE Defendant; and (4) discovery of the identities of the DOE Defendants is necessary to conduct a discovery schedule conference pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 26(f). This ex parte application is supported by the memorandum of points and authorities and declaration of Scott M. Plamondon submitted herewith and all of the papers, documents and pleadings on file in this matter.

Dated: March 18, 2011

a law corporation

weintraub genshlea chediak

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

By:

s/ Scott M. Plamondon Scott Hervey, State Bar No. 180188 Scott M. Plamondon, State Bar No. 212294 Attorneys for Plaintiff

{1295703.DOC;}

2

Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery CV11-01949 DDP (FMOx)