Dayco Funding Corporation v. Eric Christopher Chen
Filing
5
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: This case is before the Court on the Motion to Remand 3 . Plaintiff has moved to remand to state court on the basis that Defendant untimely removed the action, and because there is no basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant has failed to oppose the motion. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. No hearing is necessary. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 CV-103 Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court). (jp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WESTERN DIVISION
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
(714) 338-4750
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRY NAFISI
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 328-4450
Date: 8/2/2011
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Central Division
111 North Hill Street
Civil Filing Unit - Room 102
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Re: Case Number: 2:11-cv-05498-AHM (AJWx)
Previously Superior Court Case No. BC459587
Case Name: Dayco Funding Corporation v. Eric Christopher Chen
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
8/2/2011
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Court.
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: /s/ J. Lam (Jenny_Lam@cacd.uscourts.gov)
Deputy Clerk
G Western
$
G Eastern
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
By:
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?