Dayco Funding Corporation v. Eric Christopher Chen

Filing 5

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: This case is before the Court on the Motion to Remand 3 . Plaintiff has moved to remand to state court on the basis that Defendant untimely removed the action, and because there is no basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant has failed to oppose the motion. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. No hearing is necessary. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 CV-103 Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court). (jp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION WESTERN DIVISION 411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4750 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3535 EASTERN DIVISION TERRY NAFISI 3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450 Date: 8/2/2011 District Court Executive and Clerk of Court Los Angeles County Superior Court Central Division 111 North Hill Street Civil Filing Unit - Room 102 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re: Case Number: 2:11-cv-05498-AHM (AJWx) Previously Superior Court Case No. BC459587 Case Name: Dayco Funding Corporation v. Eric Christopher Chen Dear Sir / Madam: Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction. 8/2/2011 , the Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this Court. Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to our office. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Clerk, U. S. District Court By: /s/ J. Lam (Jenny_Lam@cacd.uscourts.gov) Deputy Clerk G Western $ G Eastern G Southern Division cc: Counsel of record Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein. Clerk, Superior Court Date CV - 103 (09/08) By: Deputy Clerk LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?