Courthouse News Service v. Michael Planet
Filing
32
Objections in support re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction #3 filed by Plaintiff Courthouse News Service. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Matteo-Boehm, Rachel)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Rachel Matteo-Boehm (SBN 195492)
rachel.matteo-boehm@hro.com
David Greene (SBN 160107)
david.greene@hro.com
Leila C. Knox (SBN 245999)
leila.knox@hro.com
HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP
560 Mission Street, Suite 250
San Francisco, CA 94105-2994
Telephone: (415) 268-2000
Facsimile: (415) 268-1999
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
12
13
14
Courthouse News Service,
CASE NO. CV11-08083 R (MANx)
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
v.
Michael D. Planet, in his official capacity
as Court Executive Officer/Clerk of the
Ventura County Superior Court.
20
Defendant.
21
22
23
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
COURTHOUSE NEWS’
EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO
THE DECLARATIONS OF JULIE
CAMACHO, CHERYL KANATZAR,
ROBERT SHERMAN AND KAREN
DALTON-KOCH
Date:
Nov. 21, 2011
Time:
10:00 am
Courtroom: G-8 (2nd Floor)
Judge: The Hon. Manuel L. Real
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
I. OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF JULIE CAMACHO
2
MATERIAL
OBJECTION AND
3
OBJECTED TO
GROUNDS
4
Declaration of Julie
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
5
Camacho in Support of
Subject to Any Exception
6
Defendant’s Opposition to
(FRE 803); Lacks
7
Plaintiff’s Motion for
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
8
Preliminary Injunction
Lacks Personal Knowledge
9
(“Camacho Decl.”), ¶ 4:
RULING
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
10
402); Insufficiently Probative
11
(FRE 403); Improper
12
Opinion Testimony (FRE
13
701); Unsubstantiated
14
Sustained:
Summary (FRE 1006).
15
Camacho Decl., ¶ 7:
Overruled:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
16
Subject to Any Exception
17
(FRE 803); Lacks
18
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
19
Lacks Personal Knowledge
20
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
21
402); Insufficiently Probative
22
(FRE 403).
Sustained:
Overruled:
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
OBJECTION AND
2
OBJECTED TO
GROUNDS
3
Camacho Decl., Exhibit B:
RULING
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
4
Subject to Any Exception
5
(FRE 803); Lacks
6
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
7
Lacks Personal Knowledge
8
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
9
402); Insufficiently Probative
Overruled:
(FRE 403).
10
11
Sustained:
Camacho Decl., ¶ 8:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
12
Subject to Any Exception
13
(FRE 803); Lacks
14
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
15
Lacks Personal Knowledge
16
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
17
402); Insufficiently Probative
18
(FRE 403).
19
Camacho Decl., ¶ 10:
Sustained:
Overruled:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
20
Subject to Any Exception
21
(FRE 803); Lacks
22
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
23
Lacks Personal Knowledge
24
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
25
402); Insufficiently Probative
26
(FRE 403).
Sustained:
Overruled:
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
OBJECTION AND
2
OBJECTED TO
GROUNDS
3
Camacho Decl., ¶ 11:
RULING
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
4
Subject to Any Exception
5
(FRE 803); Lacks
6
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
7
Lacks Personal Knowledge
8
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
9
402); Insufficiently Probative
Overruled:
(FRE 403).
10
11
Sustained:
Camacho Decl., ¶ 12:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
12
Subject to Any Exception
13
(FRE 803); Lacks
14
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
15
Lacks Personal Knowledge
16
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
17
402); Insufficiently Probative
18
(FRE 403).
19
Camacho Decl., Exh. C:
Sustained:
Overruled:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
20
Subject to Any Exception
21
(FRE 803); Lacks
22
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
23
Lacks Personal Knowledge
24
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
25
402); Insufficiently Probative
26
(FRE 403).
Sustained:
Overruled:
27
28
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
OBJECTION AND
2
OBJECTED TO
GROUNDS
3
Camacho Decl., ¶ 13:
RULING
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
4
Subject to Any Exception
5
(FRE 803); Lacks
6
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
7
Lacks Personal Knowledge
8
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
9
402); Insufficiently Probative
Overruled:
(FRE 403).
10
11
Sustained:
Camacho Decl., Ex. D:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
12
Subject to Any Exception
13
(FRE 803); Lacks
14
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
15
Lacks Personal Knowledge
16
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
17
402); Insufficiently Probative
18
(FRE 403).
19
Camacho Decl., ¶ 14:
Sustained:
Overruled:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
20
Subject to Any Exception
21
(FRE 803); Lacks
22
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
23
Lacks Personal Knowledge
24
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
25
402); Insufficiently Probative
26
(FRE 403).
Sustained:
Overruled:
27
28
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
OBJECTION AND
2
OBJECTED TO
GROUNDS
3
Camacho Decl., ¶ 15:
RULING
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
4
Subject to Any Exception
5
(FRE 803); Lacks
6
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
7
Lacks Personal Knowledge
8
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
9
402); Insufficiently Probative
10
(FRE 403); Unsubstantiated
11
Summary (FRE 1006).
12
Camacho Decl., ¶ 16:
Sustained:
Overruled:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
13
Subject to Any Exception
14
(FRE 803); Lacks
15
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
16
Lacks Personal Knowledge
17
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
18
402); Insufficiently Probative
19
(FRE 403); Unsubstantiated
20
Summary (FRE 1006).
Sustained:
Overruled:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
OBJECTION AND
2
OBJECTED TO
GROUNDS
3
Camacho Decl., ¶ 17:
RULING
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
4
Subject to Any Exception
5
(FRE 803); Lacks
6
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
7
Lacks Personal Knowledge
8
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
9
402); Insufficiently Probative
10
(FRE 403); Unsubstantiated
11
Sustained:
Summary (FRE 1006).
12
Camacho Decl., ¶ 18:
Overruled:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
13
Subject to Any Exception
14
(FRE 803); Lacks
15
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
16
Lacks Personal Knowledge
17
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
18
402); Insufficiently Probative
19
(FRE 403); Unsubstantiated
20
Summary (FRE 1006).
Sustained:
Overruled:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
OBJECTION AND
2
OBJECTED TO
GROUNDS
3
Camacho Decl., ¶ 19:
RULING
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
4
Subject to Any Exception
5
(FRE 803); Lacks
6
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
7
Lacks Personal Knowledge
8
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
9
402); Insufficiently Probative
10
(FRE 403); Unsubstantiated
11
Sustained:
Summary (FRE 1006).
12
Camacho Decl., ¶ 20:
Overruled:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
13
Subject to Any Exception
14
(FRE 803); Lacks
15
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
16
Lacks Personal Knowledge
17
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
18
402); Insufficiently Probative
19
(FRE 403); Unsubstantiated
20
Summary (FRE 1006).
Sustained:
Overruled:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
OBJECTION AND
2
OBJECTED TO
GROUNDS
3
Camacho Decl., ¶ 21:
RULING
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
4
Subject to Any Exception
5
(FRE 803); Lacks
6
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
7
Lacks Personal Knowledge
8
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
9
402); Insufficiently Probative
10
(FRE 403); Unsubstantiated
11
Sustained:
Summary (FRE 1006).
12
Camacho Decl., ¶ 22:
Overruled:
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
13
Subject to Any Exception
14
(FRE 803); Lacks
15
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
16
Lacks Personal Knowledge
17
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
18
402); Insufficiently Probative
19
(FRE 403); Unsubstantiated
20
Summary (FRE 1006).
Sustained:
Overruled:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
OBJECTION AND
2
OBJECTED TO
GROUNDS
3
Camacho Decl., ¶ 23:
RULING
Hearsay (FRE 802); Not
4
Subject to Any Exception
5
(FRE 803); Lacks
6
Foundation (FRE 104(b));
7
Lacks Personal Knowledge
8
(FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE
9
402); Insufficiently Probative
10
(FRE 403); Improper
11
701); Unsubstantiated
13
Overruled:
Opinion Testimony (FRE
12
Sustained:
Summary (FRE 1006).
14
15
16
II. OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF CHERYL KANATZAR
17
MATERIAL
GROUNDS FOR
18
OBJECTED TO
OBJECTION
RULING
19
20
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 5:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
21
Sustained:
22
23
24
Overruled:
25
26
27
28
9
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
Kanatzar Decl. ¶ 6:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
2
3
4
Overruled:
5
6
7
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 7:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
8
9
10
Overruled:
11
12
13
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 8:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
14
Sustained:
15
16
17
Overruled:
18
19
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 9:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
20
Sustained:
21
22
23
Overruled:
24
25
26
27
28
10
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 10:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
2
3
4
Overruled:
5
6
7
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 11:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
8
9
10
Overruled:
11
12
13
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 29:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
14
Sustained:
15
16
17
Overruled:
18
19
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 32:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
20
Sustained:
21
22
23
Overruled:
24
25
26
27
28
11
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
Kanatzar Decl., Exh. A:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
2
3
4
Overruled:
5
6
7
Kanatzar Decl., Exh. B:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
8
9
10
Overruled:
11
12
13
14
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 12:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
15
Sustained:
16
17
18
Overruled:
19
20
Kanatzar Decl., Exh. C:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
21
Sustained:
22
23
24
Overruled:
25
26
27
28
12
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 13:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
2
3
4
Overruled:
5
6
7
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 14:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
8
9
10
Overruled:
11
12
13
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 15:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
14
Sustained:
15
16
17
Overruled:
18
19
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 16:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
20
Sustained:
21
22
23
Overruled:
24
25
26
27
28
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 17:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
2
3
4
Overruled:
5
6
7
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 18:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
8
9
10
Overruled:
11
12
13
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 30:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
14
Sustained:
15
16
17
Overruled:
18
19
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 31:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
20
Sustained:
21
22
23
Overruled:
24
25
26
27
28
14
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 32:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
2
3
4
Overruled:
5
6
7
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 33:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
8
9
10
Overruled:
11
12
13
Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 34:
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
14
Sustained:
15
16
17
Overruled:
18
19
20
III.
OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF ROBERT SHERMAN
21
MATERIAL
GROUNDS FOR
22
OBJECTED TO
OBJECTION
23
Declaration of Robert
24
Sherman in Support of
25
Defendant’s Opposition to
26
Plaintiff’s Motion for
27
Preliminary Injunction
28
RULING
(“Sherman Decl.”), ¶ 2
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
Overruled:
15
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
GROUNDS FOR
2
OBJECTED TO
OBJECTION
3
Sherman Decl., ¶ 3
RULING
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
4
5
6
Overruled:
7
8
9
Sherman Decl., ¶ 4
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
10
Sustained:
11
12
13
Overruled:
14
15
Sherman Decl., ¶ 5
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
16
Sustained:
17
18
19
Overruled:
20
21
Sherman Decl., ¶ 6
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
22
Sustained:
23
24
25
Overruled:
26
27
28
16
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
GROUNDS FOR
2
OBJECTED TO
OBJECTION
3
Sherman Decl., ¶ 7
RULING
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
4
5
6
Overruled:
7
8
9
Sherman Decl., ¶ 8
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
10
Sustained:
11
12
13
Overruled:
14
15
Sherman Decl., ¶ 9
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
16
Sustained:
17
18
19
Overruled:
20
21
Sherman Decl., ¶ 10
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
22
Sustained:
23
24
25
Overruled:
26
27
28
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
GROUNDS FOR
2
OBJECTED TO
OBJECTION
3
Sherman Decl., ¶ 11
RULING
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
4
5
6
Overruled:
7
8
9
Sherman Decl., ¶ 12
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
10
Sustained:
11
12
13
Overruled:
14
15
Sherman Decl., ¶ 13
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
16
Sustained:
17
18
19
Overruled:
20
21
Sherman Decl., ¶ 14
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
22
Sustained:
23
24
25
Overruled:
26
27
28
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
MATERIAL
GROUNDS FOR
2
OBJECTED TO
OBJECTION
3
Sherman Decl., ¶ 15
RULING
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
Sustained:
4
5
6
Overruled:
7
8
9
Sherman Decl., Exh. A
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
10
Sustained:
11
12
13
Overruled:
14
15
Sherman Decl., Exh. B
Irrelevant (FRE 402)
16
Sustained:
17
18
19
Overruled:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
1
IV.
OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF KAREN DALTON-KOCH
2
MATERIAL
GROUNDS FOR
3
OBJECTED TO
OBJECTION
4
Declaration of Karen
Irrelevant (FRE 402);
5
Dalton-Koch in Support
Lacks Foundation (FRE
6
of Defendant’s
104(b))
7
Opposition to Plaintiff’s
8
Motion for Preliminary
9
Injunction, Exhibit A:
RULING
Sustained:
Overruled:
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED
Date: ________________, 2011
14
____________________________
The Honorable Manuel L. Real
United States District Court Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS
#75567 v1 saf
Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?