Courthouse News Service v. Michael Planet

Filing 32

Objections in support re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction #3 filed by Plaintiff Courthouse News Service. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Matteo-Boehm, Rachel)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rachel Matteo-Boehm (SBN 195492) rachel.matteo-boehm@hro.com David Greene (SBN 160107) david.greene@hro.com Leila C. Knox (SBN 245999) leila.knox@hro.com HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 560 Mission Street, Suite 250 San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 268-2000 Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 Attorneys for Plaintiff COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 12 13 14 Courthouse News Service, CASE NO. CV11-08083 R (MANx) 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 v. Michael D. Planet, in his official capacity as Court Executive Officer/Clerk of the Ventura County Superior Court. 20 Defendant. 21 22 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COURTHOUSE NEWS’ EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATIONS OF JULIE CAMACHO, CHERYL KANATZAR, ROBERT SHERMAN AND KAREN DALTON-KOCH Date: Nov. 21, 2011 Time: 10:00 am Courtroom: G-8 (2nd Floor) Judge: The Hon. Manuel L. Real 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 I. OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF JULIE CAMACHO 2 MATERIAL OBJECTION AND 3 OBJECTED TO GROUNDS 4 Declaration of Julie Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 5 Camacho in Support of Subject to Any Exception 6 Defendant’s Opposition to (FRE 803); Lacks 7 Plaintiff’s Motion for Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 8 Preliminary Injunction Lacks Personal Knowledge 9 (“Camacho Decl.”), ¶ 4: RULING (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 10 402); Insufficiently Probative 11 (FRE 403); Improper 12 Opinion Testimony (FRE 13 701); Unsubstantiated 14 Sustained: Summary (FRE 1006). 15 Camacho Decl., ¶ 7: Overruled: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 16 Subject to Any Exception 17 (FRE 803); Lacks 18 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 19 Lacks Personal Knowledge 20 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 21 402); Insufficiently Probative 22 (FRE 403). Sustained: Overruled: 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL OBJECTION AND 2 OBJECTED TO GROUNDS 3 Camacho Decl., Exhibit B: RULING Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 4 Subject to Any Exception 5 (FRE 803); Lacks 6 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 7 Lacks Personal Knowledge 8 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 9 402); Insufficiently Probative Overruled: (FRE 403). 10 11 Sustained: Camacho Decl., ¶ 8: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 12 Subject to Any Exception 13 (FRE 803); Lacks 14 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 15 Lacks Personal Knowledge 16 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 17 402); Insufficiently Probative 18 (FRE 403). 19 Camacho Decl., ¶ 10: Sustained: Overruled: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 20 Subject to Any Exception 21 (FRE 803); Lacks 22 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 23 Lacks Personal Knowledge 24 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 25 402); Insufficiently Probative 26 (FRE 403). Sustained: Overruled: 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL OBJECTION AND 2 OBJECTED TO GROUNDS 3 Camacho Decl., ¶ 11: RULING Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 4 Subject to Any Exception 5 (FRE 803); Lacks 6 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 7 Lacks Personal Knowledge 8 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 9 402); Insufficiently Probative Overruled: (FRE 403). 10 11 Sustained: Camacho Decl., ¶ 12: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 12 Subject to Any Exception 13 (FRE 803); Lacks 14 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 15 Lacks Personal Knowledge 16 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 17 402); Insufficiently Probative 18 (FRE 403). 19 Camacho Decl., Exh. C: Sustained: Overruled: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 20 Subject to Any Exception 21 (FRE 803); Lacks 22 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 23 Lacks Personal Knowledge 24 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 25 402); Insufficiently Probative 26 (FRE 403). Sustained: Overruled: 27 28 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL OBJECTION AND 2 OBJECTED TO GROUNDS 3 Camacho Decl., ¶ 13: RULING Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 4 Subject to Any Exception 5 (FRE 803); Lacks 6 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 7 Lacks Personal Knowledge 8 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 9 402); Insufficiently Probative Overruled: (FRE 403). 10 11 Sustained: Camacho Decl., Ex. D: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 12 Subject to Any Exception 13 (FRE 803); Lacks 14 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 15 Lacks Personal Knowledge 16 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 17 402); Insufficiently Probative 18 (FRE 403). 19 Camacho Decl., ¶ 14: Sustained: Overruled: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 20 Subject to Any Exception 21 (FRE 803); Lacks 22 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 23 Lacks Personal Knowledge 24 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 25 402); Insufficiently Probative 26 (FRE 403). Sustained: Overruled: 27 28 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL OBJECTION AND 2 OBJECTED TO GROUNDS 3 Camacho Decl., ¶ 15: RULING Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 4 Subject to Any Exception 5 (FRE 803); Lacks 6 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 7 Lacks Personal Knowledge 8 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 9 402); Insufficiently Probative 10 (FRE 403); Unsubstantiated 11 Summary (FRE 1006). 12 Camacho Decl., ¶ 16: Sustained: Overruled: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 13 Subject to Any Exception 14 (FRE 803); Lacks 15 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 16 Lacks Personal Knowledge 17 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 18 402); Insufficiently Probative 19 (FRE 403); Unsubstantiated 20 Summary (FRE 1006). Sustained: Overruled: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL OBJECTION AND 2 OBJECTED TO GROUNDS 3 Camacho Decl., ¶ 17: RULING Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 4 Subject to Any Exception 5 (FRE 803); Lacks 6 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 7 Lacks Personal Knowledge 8 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 9 402); Insufficiently Probative 10 (FRE 403); Unsubstantiated 11 Sustained: Summary (FRE 1006). 12 Camacho Decl., ¶ 18: Overruled: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 13 Subject to Any Exception 14 (FRE 803); Lacks 15 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 16 Lacks Personal Knowledge 17 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 18 402); Insufficiently Probative 19 (FRE 403); Unsubstantiated 20 Summary (FRE 1006). Sustained: Overruled: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL OBJECTION AND 2 OBJECTED TO GROUNDS 3 Camacho Decl., ¶ 19: RULING Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 4 Subject to Any Exception 5 (FRE 803); Lacks 6 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 7 Lacks Personal Knowledge 8 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 9 402); Insufficiently Probative 10 (FRE 403); Unsubstantiated 11 Sustained: Summary (FRE 1006). 12 Camacho Decl., ¶ 20: Overruled: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 13 Subject to Any Exception 14 (FRE 803); Lacks 15 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 16 Lacks Personal Knowledge 17 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 18 402); Insufficiently Probative 19 (FRE 403); Unsubstantiated 20 Summary (FRE 1006). Sustained: Overruled: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL OBJECTION AND 2 OBJECTED TO GROUNDS 3 Camacho Decl., ¶ 21: RULING Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 4 Subject to Any Exception 5 (FRE 803); Lacks 6 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 7 Lacks Personal Knowledge 8 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 9 402); Insufficiently Probative 10 (FRE 403); Unsubstantiated 11 Sustained: Summary (FRE 1006). 12 Camacho Decl., ¶ 22: Overruled: Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 13 Subject to Any Exception 14 (FRE 803); Lacks 15 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 16 Lacks Personal Knowledge 17 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 18 402); Insufficiently Probative 19 (FRE 403); Unsubstantiated 20 Summary (FRE 1006). Sustained: Overruled: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL OBJECTION AND 2 OBJECTED TO GROUNDS 3 Camacho Decl., ¶ 23: RULING Hearsay (FRE 802); Not 4 Subject to Any Exception 5 (FRE 803); Lacks 6 Foundation (FRE 104(b)); 7 Lacks Personal Knowledge 8 (FRE 602); Irrelevant (FRE 9 402); Insufficiently Probative 10 (FRE 403); Improper 11 701); Unsubstantiated 13 Overruled: Opinion Testimony (FRE 12 Sustained: Summary (FRE 1006). 14 15 16 II. OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF CHERYL KANATZAR 17 MATERIAL GROUNDS FOR 18 OBJECTED TO OBJECTION RULING 19 20 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 5: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 21 Sustained: 22 23 24 Overruled: 25 26 27 28 9 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 Kanatzar Decl. ¶ 6: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 2 3 4 Overruled: 5 6 7 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 7: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 8 9 10 Overruled: 11 12 13 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 8: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 14 Sustained: 15 16 17 Overruled: 18 19 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 9: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 20 Sustained: 21 22 23 Overruled: 24 25 26 27 28 10 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 10: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 2 3 4 Overruled: 5 6 7 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 11: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 8 9 10 Overruled: 11 12 13 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 29: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 14 Sustained: 15 16 17 Overruled: 18 19 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 32: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 20 Sustained: 21 22 23 Overruled: 24 25 26 27 28 11 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 Kanatzar Decl., Exh. A: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 2 3 4 Overruled: 5 6 7 Kanatzar Decl., Exh. B: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 8 9 10 Overruled: 11 12 13 14 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 12: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 15 Sustained: 16 17 18 Overruled: 19 20 Kanatzar Decl., Exh. C: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 21 Sustained: 22 23 24 Overruled: 25 26 27 28 12 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 13: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 2 3 4 Overruled: 5 6 7 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 14: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 8 9 10 Overruled: 11 12 13 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 15: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 14 Sustained: 15 16 17 Overruled: 18 19 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 16: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 20 Sustained: 21 22 23 Overruled: 24 25 26 27 28 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 17: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 2 3 4 Overruled: 5 6 7 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 18: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 8 9 10 Overruled: 11 12 13 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 30: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 14 Sustained: 15 16 17 Overruled: 18 19 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 31: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 20 Sustained: 21 22 23 Overruled: 24 25 26 27 28 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 32: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 2 3 4 Overruled: 5 6 7 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 33: Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 8 9 10 Overruled: 11 12 13 Kanatzar Decl., ¶ 34: Irrelevant (FRE 402) 14 Sustained: 15 16 17 Overruled: 18 19 20 III. OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF ROBERT SHERMAN 21 MATERIAL GROUNDS FOR 22 OBJECTED TO OBJECTION 23 Declaration of Robert 24 Sherman in Support of 25 Defendant’s Opposition to 26 Plaintiff’s Motion for 27 Preliminary Injunction 28 RULING (“Sherman Decl.”), ¶ 2 Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: Overruled: 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL GROUNDS FOR 2 OBJECTED TO OBJECTION 3 Sherman Decl., ¶ 3 RULING Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 4 5 6 Overruled: 7 8 9 Sherman Decl., ¶ 4 Irrelevant (FRE 402) 10 Sustained: 11 12 13 Overruled: 14 15 Sherman Decl., ¶ 5 Irrelevant (FRE 402) 16 Sustained: 17 18 19 Overruled: 20 21 Sherman Decl., ¶ 6 Irrelevant (FRE 402) 22 Sustained: 23 24 25 Overruled: 26 27 28 16 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL GROUNDS FOR 2 OBJECTED TO OBJECTION 3 Sherman Decl., ¶ 7 RULING Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 4 5 6 Overruled: 7 8 9 Sherman Decl., ¶ 8 Irrelevant (FRE 402) 10 Sustained: 11 12 13 Overruled: 14 15 Sherman Decl., ¶ 9 Irrelevant (FRE 402) 16 Sustained: 17 18 19 Overruled: 20 21 Sherman Decl., ¶ 10 Irrelevant (FRE 402) 22 Sustained: 23 24 25 Overruled: 26 27 28 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL GROUNDS FOR 2 OBJECTED TO OBJECTION 3 Sherman Decl., ¶ 11 RULING Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 4 5 6 Overruled: 7 8 9 Sherman Decl., ¶ 12 Irrelevant (FRE 402) 10 Sustained: 11 12 13 Overruled: 14 15 Sherman Decl., ¶ 13 Irrelevant (FRE 402) 16 Sustained: 17 18 19 Overruled: 20 21 Sherman Decl., ¶ 14 Irrelevant (FRE 402) 22 Sustained: 23 24 25 Overruled: 26 27 28 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 MATERIAL GROUNDS FOR 2 OBJECTED TO OBJECTION 3 Sherman Decl., ¶ 15 RULING Irrelevant (FRE 402) Sustained: 4 5 6 Overruled: 7 8 9 Sherman Decl., Exh. A Irrelevant (FRE 402) 10 Sustained: 11 12 13 Overruled: 14 15 Sherman Decl., Exh. B Irrelevant (FRE 402) 16 Sustained: 17 18 19 Overruled: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx) 1 IV. OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF KAREN DALTON-KOCH 2 MATERIAL GROUNDS FOR 3 OBJECTED TO OBJECTION 4 Declaration of Karen Irrelevant (FRE 402); 5 Dalton-Koch in Support Lacks Foundation (FRE 6 of Defendant’s 104(b)) 7 Opposition to Plaintiff’s 8 Motion for Preliminary 9 Injunction, Exhibit A: RULING Sustained: Overruled: 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED Date: ________________, 2011 14 ____________________________ The Honorable Manuel L. Real United States District Court Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DECLARATIONS #75567 v1 saf Case No. CV11-08083R (MANx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?