LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated

Filing 126

EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD SUPPORTING LEGALZOOM'S OPPOSITION TO ROCKET LAWYER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR (2) IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON THE PENDING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff LegalZoom.com Inc. (Attachments: # 1 LegalZoom.com, Inc.'s Motion to Supplement Factual Record, # 2 Declaration of Aaron Allan, # 3 Declaration of Barak Vaughn, # 4 Proposed Order Granting Ex Parte Application, # 5 Proposed Order Granting LegalZoom's Motion to Supplement Factual Record)(Heather, Fred)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

PATRICIA L. GLASER - State Bar No. 55668
[e-mail]
FRED D. HEATHER - State Bar No. 110650
[e-mail]
AARON P. ALLAN - State Bar No. 144406
[e-mail]
GLASER WEIL FINK HOWARD
AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LegalZoom.com, Inc.

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

WESTERN DIVISION

12
13

LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,

14
15

v.

16

ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED,
a Delaware corporation,

17
18
19
20
21
22

Defendant.

CASE NO.: CV 12-9942-GAF
(AGRx)
Hon. Gary A. Feess
Courtroom: 740
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR (1)
ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE
RECORD SUPPORTING
LEGALZOOM’S OPPOSITION TO
ROCKET LAWYER’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR
(2) IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO
CONTINUE THE HEARING ON
PENDING CROSS MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEGALZOOM’S EX PARTE APPLICATION

1

Before this Court is Plaintiff LegalZoom’s (“LegalZoom”) Ex Parte

2

Application For (1) Order Shortening Time on Motion to Supplement The Record

3

Supporting LegalZoom’s Opposition to Rocket Lawyer’s Motion for Summary

4

Judgment, or (2) In the Alternative, To Continue the Hearing on the Pending Cross

5

Motions for Summary Judgment (the “Application”). Having considered

6

LegalZoom’s Application, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support

7

thereof, the Declaration of Barak Vaughn, the Declaration of Aaron P. Allan, the

8

accompanying exhibits, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the

9

Application as follows:

10

__

The Motion to Supplement the Record will be heard on October 6, 2014

11

at 9:30 a.m., to be heard concurrently with the currently scheduled cross-motions for

12

summary judgment. Any opposition to the Motion must be filed no later than

13

_________________________, 2014.

14
15
16

__

The Motion to Supplement the Record will be heard on October 27, 2014

and any opposition and reply thereto will be filed as required under the Local Rule.
__

The Court hereby continues the October 6, 2014 hearing date for the

17

cross-motions for summary judgment to October 27, 2014 at 9:30 a.m., to be heard

18

concurrently with the Motion to Supplement the Record.

19
20
21
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:_________________, 2014
HON. GARY A. FEESS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEGALZOOM’S EX PARTE APPLICATION
939278