LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated

Filing 166

EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to TO FILE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT FACTUAL RECORD IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE filed by Defendant Rocket Lawyer Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 DECLARATION OF HONGAN VU IN SUPPORT OF ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATEDS EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT FACTUAL RECORD AND TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULE, # 2 ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATEDS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT FACTUAL RECORD IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, # 3 DECLARATION OF MICHAEL JONES IN SUPPORT OF ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATEDS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT FACTUAL RECORD IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, # 4 Proposed Order GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT FACTUAL RECORD, # 5 Proposed Order GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT FACTUAL RECORD AND TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULE)(Vu, Hong-An)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Forrest A. Hainline III (SBN 64166) fhainline@goodwinprocter.com Hong-An Vu (SBN 266268) hvu@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4003 Tel.: 415.733.6000 Fax.: 415.677.9041 Michael T. Jones (SBN 290660) mjones@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, California 94025-1105 Tel.: 650.752.3100 Fax.: 650.853.1038 Brian W. Cook (Pro Hac Vice) bcook@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 53 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109-2802 Tel.: 617.570.1000 Fax.: 617.523.1231 Attorneys for Defendant ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 WESTERN DIVISION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 26 27 28 NO. 2:12-CV-09942-GAF-AGR Case No. 2:12-cv-09942-GAF-AGR DECLARATION OF HONGAN VU IN SUPPORT OF ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT FACTUAL RECORD AND TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULE Date: Time: Judge: Courtroom: TBD TBD Judge Gary A. Feess 740 255 East Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Action Filed: November 20, 2012 DECLARATION OF HONG-AN VU 1 2 I, Hong-An Vu, declare as follows: 3 1. I am an associate at Goodwin Procter LLP, counsel of record for 4 defendant and counterclaimant Rocket Lawyer Incorporated (“Rocket Lawyer”). I 5 submit this declaration in support of Rocket Lawyer’s Ex Parte Application for an 6 Order Allowing Rocket Lawyer to File a Motion to Supplement and To Establish 7 Briefing Schedule. I am over the age of 18 years. Unless otherwise indicated, I have 8 personal knowledge of the matters stated herein and, if called upon to do so, I could 9 and would competently testify to them under oath. 10 11 2. On October 3, 2014, LegalZoom confirmed that it will rely exclusively on testimony from its expert for damages. 12 3. On October 6, 2014, LegalZoom served the Second Supplemental 13 Expert Report of Alan G. Goedde, PH.D., its damages expert, which by its terms 14 supersedes all prior expert reports. 15 16 4. Rocket Lawyer took the depositions of LegalZoom’s fact witnesses between October 3, 2014 and October 9, 2014. 17 5. I spoke with counsel for LegalZoom, Fred Heather and Aaron Allan, on 18 October 20, 2014 at 2:44 p.m. about this ex parte application, the relief sought, and 19 the basis for the application. I also informed counsel that Rocket Lawyer intended 20 to file the application on October 21, 2014. 21 6. As requested by LegalZoom’s counsel, on October 20, 2014, I emailed 22 to counsel for LegalZoom a summary of Rocket Lawyer’s ex parte application. A 23 true and correct copy of this email communication is hereto attached as Exhibit A. 24 LegalZoom stated that they would oppose the ex parte application and motion to 25 supplement the record. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -1- 1 2 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 21st day of October, 2014. 3 4 /s/ Hong-An Vu HONG-AN VU 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A Vu, Hong-An From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Aaron Allan <aallan@glaserweil.com> Monday, October 20, 2014 5:11 PM Vu, Hong-An Hainline, Forrest A; Jones, Michael T; Cook, Brian W; Barak Vaughn; Fred Heather RE: Rocket Lawyer Ex Parte to Supplement the Record Thank you for the clarification.  But our position remains the same, and we intend to oppose.    Aaron P. Allan| Partner  Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP  10250 Constellation Blvd., 19th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067  Main: 310.553.3000 |Direct: 310.282.6279|Fax: 310.785.3579    From: Vu, Hong-An [mailto:HVu@goodwinprocter.com] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 5:04 PM To: Aaron Allan Cc: Hainline, Forrest A; Jones, Michael T; Cook, Brian W; Barak Vaughn; Fred Heather Subject: RE: Rocket Lawyer Ex Parte to Supplement the Record   Aaron,    We have taken what you said into consideration.  We will file tomorrow an ex parte application seeking leave to file the  accompanying motion to supplement the record and to set a briefing schedule such that the motion may be heard on  November 10.  Please let us know if this changes your position.    Thanks,  Hong‐An    Hong-An Vu Goodwin Procter LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 T: 415-733-6114 F: 415-677-9041 hvu@goodwinprocter.com www.goodwinprocter.com        From: Aaron Allan [mailto:aallan@glaserweil.com] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:41 PM To: Vu, Hong-An Cc: Hainline, Forrest A; Jones, Michael T; Cook, Brian W; Barak Vaughn; Fred Heather Subject: RE: Rocket Lawyer Ex Parte to Supplement the Record   Dear Hong‐An,    Thank you for your email.  Based on your description of the application and the relief being sought, it appears that your  application is neither procedurally proper nor supported by the record, and we intend to oppose it.  We strongly suggest  that you reconsider before pursuing such an application.  1 EXHIBIT A -3-   Aaron    Aaron P. Allan| Partner  Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP  10250 Constellation Blvd., 19th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067  Main: 310.553.3000 |Direct: 310.282.6279|Fax: 310.785.3579    From: Vu, Hong-An [mailto:HVu@goodwinprocter.com] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:08 PM To: Fred Heather; Aaron Allan Cc: Hainline, Forrest A; Jones, Michael T; Cook, Brian W; Barak Vaughn Subject: Rocket Lawyer Ex Parte to Supplement the Record   Fred and Aaron,    As discussed on the call at 2:44 p.m., here is a short description of our ex parte application.      We are seeking to supplement the summary judgment record with very recently acquired evidence.  Specifically, we  would like the court to consider that you have not provided a 30(b)(6) witness to testify about damages and that your  damages expert has only provided an opinion about business formation ads and ads that were placed on LegalZoom’s  brand terms.  You have not provided any evidence relating to damages from ads that appear on Rocket Lawyer’s  website, in particular, your allegations relating to free trial, free legal review, and free help from local attorneys  ads.  Rocket Lawyer intends to move ex parte because there is not sufficient time between now and the November 10  hearing to file and brief the motion pursuant to 35 day minimum meet and confer and briefing schedule established by  the local rules.      You stated on the call that you would respond to us by midnight tonight about whether you will oppose this application  or not. We look forward to your response.    Thanks,  Hong‐An    Hong-An Vu Goodwin Procter LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 T: 415-733-6114 F: 415-677-9041 hvu@goodwinprocter.com www.goodwinprocter.com    ******************************************************************* This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. ******************************************************************* 2 EXHIBIT A -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?