LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated
Filing
18
ANSWER to Amended Complaint 14 LegalZoom.com Inc.'s Answer to Rocket Lawyer Incoporated's Amended Counterclaims filed by plaintiff LegalZoom.com Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Heather, Fred)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PATRICIA L. GLASER - State Bar No. 55668
pglaser@glaserweil.com
FRED D. HEATHER - State Bar No. 110650
fheather@glaserweil.com
MARY ANN T. NGUYEN – State Bar No. 269099
mnguyen@glaserweil.com
GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 553-3000
Facsimile: (310) 556-2920
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
WESTERN DIVISION
12
13
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED,
a Delaware corporation
17
18
19
20
Defendant.
CASE NO.: CV 12-9942-GAF (AGRx)
Hon. Gary A. Feess
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S
ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER
INCORPORATED’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
Courtroom: 740
Judge:
Judge Gary A. Feess
255 East Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Original Complaint Filed: November
20, 2012
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
787780
1
Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. (“LegalZoom” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its
2
undersigned counsel, hereby respond to, and answer as follows to Defendant Rocket
3
Lawyer Incorporated’s (“RocketLawyer” or “Defendant”) Counterclaims:
ANSWER
4
5
1.
Denied. LegalZoom has brought this lawsuit to expose the willful and
6
systematic acts of false advertising and unfair competition by RocketLawyer, which
7
misleads consumers and inflicts competitive harm upon LegalZoom and others.
8
9
10
2.
Denied. LegalZoom specifically denies that it “created” or “sanctioned
the creation” of the website Legalspring.com. LegalZoom further denies that
Legalspring.com’s registrant and manager, Travis Giggy, is LegalZoom’s agent.
11
3.
Admitted.
12
4.
Admitted.
13
5.
Denied except to admit that the court has personal jurisdiction over it.
14
6.
Admitted.
15
7.
Admitted.
16
8.
Denied. LegalZoom provides personalized, affordable, online legal
17
18
solutions for families and small businesses.
9.
Denied except to admit that LegalZoom was founded in 2000 by
19
attorneys with experience at some of the top law firms in the country, and has helped
20
over two million Americans become protected with binding legal documents.
21
10.
After reasonable investigation, LegalZoom is without knowledge or
22
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of this
23
paragraph and they are therefore denied.
24
11.
After reasonable investigation, LegalZoom is without knowledge or
25
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of this
26
paragraph and they are therefore denied.
27
28
12.
After reasonable investigation, LegalZoom is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of this
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
787780
1
2
paragraph and they are therefore denied.
13.
After reasonable investigation, LegalZoom is without knowledge or
3
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of this
4
paragraph and they are therefore denied.
5
14.
Admitted.
6
15.
Denied. LegalZoom does not currently purchase search terms from
7
Google and other search engines such as Bing.com and Yahoo.com that relate to
8
RocketLawyer.
9
16.
After reasonable investigation, LegalZoom is without knowledge or
10
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of this
11
paragraph and they are therefore denied. However, to the extent that this paragraph
12
purports to interpret the contents of the SpyFu.com website and the Wall Street
13
Journal article, such documents, being in writing, speak for themselves.
14
17.
Admitted.
15
18.
The allegations of this paragraph are conclusions of law to which no
16
response is required. To the extent any allegations in paragraph 18 are factual,
17
LegalZoom denies all such allegations to the extent that such allegations pertain to it.
18
19.
LegalZoom admits only that certain of LegalZoom’s advertisements for
19
its incorporation services say “Launch your new corporation. Free to Get Started,”
20
but specifically denies that the language is in any way similar to RocketLawyer’s
21
advertisements.
22
20.
After reasonable investigation, LegalZoom is without knowledge or
23
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of this
24
paragraph and they are therefore denied.
25
21.
After reasonable investigation, LegalZoom is without knowledge or
26
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of this
27
paragraph and they are therefore denied.
28
22.
The allegations of this paragraph are conclusions of law to which no
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
787780
1
response is required. To the extent any allegations in paragraph 22 are factual,
2
LegalZoom denies all such allegations to the extent that such allegations pertain to it
3
except to admit that RocketLawyer has registered the two domain names –
4
www.legalzoomer.com and www.legalzoomgadget.com.
5
23.
Denied. When accessing Legalzoomer.com on Internet Explorer,
6
Mozilla and Chrome, a user is directed to the GoDaddy.com website, which provides
7
the greeting, “Welcome to legalzoomer.com.”
8
9
24.
After reasonable investigation, LegalZoom is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of this
10
paragraph and they are therefore denied. However, if RocketLawyer is in fact willing
11
to transfer these domains to LegalZoom, LegalZoom will accept RocketLawyer’s
12
transfer of these domains to LegalZoom.
13
25.
Admitted.
14
26.
After reasonable investigation, LegalZoom is without knowledge or
15
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of this
16
paragraph and they are therefore denied.
17
18
19
27.
Denied except to admit that LegalZoom operates
www.legalcenterpro.com.
28.
Denied except to the extent that this paragraph purports to characterize
20
the Reuter article and LegalZoom’s May 10, 2012 S-1 filing. Such documents, being
21
in writing, speak for themselves.
22
29.
Denied.
23
30.
Denied.
24
31.
Denied except to admit that LegalZoom states on its website that it is the
25
leading, nationally recognized legal brand for small business and consumers in the
26
United States.
27
28
32.
The allegations of this paragraph are conclusions of law to which no
response is required. To the extent any allegations in paragraph 32 are factual,
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
787780
1
2
LegalZoom denies all such allegations to the extent that such allegations pertain to it.
33.
Denied except to admit that Legalspring.com does not reference, among
3
other legal services websites, Rocket Lawyer. Legalspring.com does, however,
4
reference (and provide reviews) for some of LegalZoom’s top competitors.
5
34.
6
speaks for itself.
7
35.
8
9
Admitted only that the Legalspring.com website is a document that
Denied except to admit that Legalspring.com is registered to Travis
Giggy.
36.
Denied except to admit that Legalspring.com, is a participant in
10
LegalZoom’s Affiliate Program and, as a participant, is entitled to receive a
11
commission for directing customers of Legalspring.com to the LegalZoom website
12
using a unique URL.
13
37.
The allegations of this paragraph are conclusions of law to which no
14
response is required. To the extent any allegations in paragraph 32 are factual,
15
LegalZoom denies all such allegations to the extent that such allegations pertain to it.
16
38.
Denied.
17
39.
Denied.
18
40.
Admitted only that the Legalspring.com website is a document that
19
speaks for itself.
20
41.
Denied except to admit that LegalZoom operated
21
www.legalcenterpro.com and www.lightwavelaw.com. Legaldocumentfinder.com
22
and Estateguidance.com are independent affiliate sites.
23
42.
Denied.
COUNT I
24
25
43.
Realleges paragraphs 1 through 42.
26
44.
Denied except to admit that an actual and justiciable case and
27
controversy exists between the parties as to whether RocketLawyer has engaged in
28
federal false advertising or unfair competition in violation of the Lanham Act based
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
787780
1
on its advertisements of its purportedly “free” services and the terms of its “free”
2
services.
3
45.
Denied.
COUNT II
4
5
46.
Realleges paragraphs 1 through 45.
6
47.
Denied except to admit that an actual and justiciable case and
7
controversy exists between the parties as to whether RocketLawyer has engaged in
8
false advertising in violation of California Business and Professions Code section
9
17500 based on its advertisements of its purportedly “free” services and the terms of
10
11
its “free” services.
48.
Denied.
COUNT III
12
13
49.
Realleges paragraphs 1 through 48.
14
50.
Denied except to admit that an actual and justiciable case and
15
controversy exists between the parties as to whether RocketLawyer has engaged in
16
unfair competition in violation of California Business and Professions Code section
17
17200 based on its advertisements of its purportedly “free” services and the terms of
18
its “free” services through key word bidding.
19
51.
Denied.
COUNT IV
20
21
52.
Realleges paragraphs 1 through 51.
22
53.
LegalZoom is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a
23
belief as to the truth of any of the allegations set forth in this paragraph and they are
24
therefore denied.
25
54.
26
Denied except to admit that LegalSpring.com states that LegalZoom is
the best legal services website.
27
55.
Denied.
28
56.
Denied.
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
787780
1
57.
Denied.
2
58.
Denied.
3
59.
Denied.
COUNT V
4
5
60.
Realleges paragraphs 1 through 59.
6
61.
Denied.
7
62.
LegalZoom is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a
8
belief as to the truth of any of the allegations set forth in this paragraph and they are
9
therefore denied.
10
63.
11
Denied except to admit that LegalSpring.com states that LegalZoom is
the best legal services website.
12
64.
Denied.
13
65.
Denied.
14
66.
Denied.
15
67.
Denied.
16
68.
Denied.
17
69.
Denied.
COUNT VI
18
19
70.
Realleges paragraphs 1 through 69.
20
71.
Denied.
21
72.
Denied.
22
73.
Denied.
23
74.
Denied.
24
75.
Denied.
25
76.
Denied.
RESPONSE TO ROCKETLAWYER’S PRAYER FOR RELIEF
26
27
28
1.
The remaining paragraphs contain prayers for relief to which no response
is required. To the extent a response is required, LegalZoom denies that
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
787780
1
RocketLawyer is entitled to any relief.
2
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
3
LegalZoom provides its affirmative defenses as known at this time below
4
without assuming the burden of proof when such burden would otherwise be on
5
RocketLawyer.
6
FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
7
(Failure to State a Claim)
8
1.
RocketLawyer fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
9
SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
10
(Unclean Hands)
11
2.
RocketLawyer’s claims and remedies are barred, in whole or in part, for
12
want of equity or by the doctrine of unclean hands. Specifically, RocketLawyer
13
engages in false and misleading advertising and unfair competition practices. See
14
First Amended Complaint at ¶¶ 12-16. RocketLawyer’s unclean hands warrant
15
dismissal and denial of all remedies.
16
THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
17
(Injunctive Relief Unavailable)
18
3.
RocketLawyer is not entitled to an injunction because, among other
19
things, assuming it was entitled, RocketLawyer has an adequate remedy at law, and
20
no basis exists for the grant of equitable relief.
21
FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
22
(Laches)
23
4.
On information and belief, RocketLawyer delayed filing suit for an
24
unreasonable and inexcusable length of time from when it knew or reasonably should
25
have known of LegalZoom’s alleged misconducts. RocketLawyer raises the alleged
26
misconduct only to attempt to deflect the negative publicity resulting from
27
LegalZoom’s filing of its complaint against RocketLawyer. This delay has prejudiced
28
and injured LegalZoom.
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
787780
1
FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
2
(Statute of Limitations)
3
5.
RocketLawyer’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the applicable
4
statute of limitations to the extent that RocketLawyer’s claims are based on conduct
5
outside the statute of limitations.
6
SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
7
(Punitive and Exemplary Damages Unavailable)
8
9
6.
The requirements and circumstances warranting punitive and exemplary
damages are not satisfied. Even more, punitive damages is not an available remedy
10
for the alleged violation of California Business and Professions Code Sections 17200
11
and 17500.
12
SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
13
(No Agency)
14
7.
If RocketLawyer sustained any injury or incurred any loss or damages as
15
alleged in RocketLawyer’s Counterclaims, such injuries were caused in whole or in
16
part by acts or omissions of persons over whom LegalZoom neither exercised nor had
17
any right of control for whom LegalZoom is and was not responsible, and whose
18
conduct LegalZoom had no duty or reason to anticipate or control. Specifically,
19
Legalspring.com’s registrant and manager, Travis Giggy, is not LegalZoom’s agent.
20
EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
21
(Lack of Standing)
22
23
8.
its Amended Counterclaims.
RESERVATION OF ADDITIONAL DEFENSES
24
25
RocketLawyer lacks standing to bring all or some of its claims alleged in
9.
Discovery in this action has not yet commenced and LegalZoom
26
continues to investigate the allegations set forth in RocketLawyer’s Counterclaims.
27
LegalZoom specifically gives notice that it intends to rely upon such other defenses as
28
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
787780
1
may become available by law, or pursuant to statute, or discovery proceedings in this
2
case, and hereby reserves the right to assert such additional defenses.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
WHEREFORE, LegalZoom respectfully requests:
1.
That RocketLawyer’s Counterclaims be dismissed in its entirety, with
prejudice;
2.
That RocketLawyer take nothing by way of its Counterclaims and that
judgment be rendered in favor of LegalZoom; and
3.
That LegalZoom be awarded its reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees and
such other and further relief as may be just and proper.
11
12
DATED: February 11, 2013
GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
13
14
By: /s/ Fred D. Heather
PATRICIA L. GLASER
FRED D. HEATHER
MARY ANN T. NGUYEN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
15
16
17
18
19
20
JURY TRIAL DEMAND
In accordance with Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and L.R.
21
38-1, LegalZoom respectfully demands a trial by jury on all issues and claims so
22
triable.
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S ANSWER TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED’’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
787780
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?