LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated

Filing 193

NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Consent to Magistrate and Joint Stipulation re Status Conference,,, 192 (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge)(Jones, Michael)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Forrest A. Hainline III (SBN 64166)
[e-mail]
Hong-An Vu (SBN 266268)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]
Michael T. Jones (SBN 290660)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025-1105
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]
Brian W. Cook (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
53 State Street
Boston, MA 02109-2802
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

WESTERN DIVISION
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware Case No. 2:12-cv-09942-GAF-AGR
corporation,
NOTICE OF LODGING OF
Plaintiff,
CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE AND
JOINT STIPULATION
v.
Judge:
Judge Gary A. Feess
ROCKET LAWYER
Courtroom: 740
INCORPORATED, a Delaware
255 East Temple Street
corporation,
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Action Filed: November 20, 2012
Defendant.

25
26
27
28

973167.2

1

LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Rocket Lawyer Incorporated (the “Parties”), hereby

2

lodge the attached form CV-11D Consent to magistrate and stipulate and agree as

3

follows:

4

1.

5

A. Feess is scheduled to retire before the resolution of this case.

6
7

2.

10

The Court permitted the Parties an opportunity to decide whether to

consent to one of the available magistrates or to turn to the Wheel.

8
9

On November 20, 2014, the Court informed the Parties that Judge Gary

3.

After meeting and conferring, the Parties consent to have Judge Suzanne

H. Segal conduct all further proceedings in the present case, including trial and final
judgment.

11

4.

The Parties further agree that if they elect to pursue a settlement

12

conference in this case, they would do so with Judge Jay C. Gandhi as originally

13

proposed in the Rule 26(f) Report, and pursuant to the Court’s current scheduling

14

order.

15

5.

If Judge Segal is unavailable to take this case, then the Parties consent to

16

have Judge Gandhi conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and

17

final judgment; and if in such a circumstance the Parties elect to pursue a settlement

18

conference, then they would do so before Judge Segal under the Court’s current

19

scheduling order.

20
21

6.

Should Judge Segal be unavailable, the Parties shall promptly submit

form CV-11D consenting to Judge Gandhi.

22

7.

If neither Judge Segal or Judge Gandhi are available, the Parties shall

23

have an opportunity to meet and confer about consenting to a different magistrate

24

judge or about whether to decide to go to the Wheel.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: November 25, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

3
By:

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

/s/Michael T. Jones
Forrest A. Hainline III
[e-mail]
Hong-An Vu (SBN 266268)
[e-mail]
Michael T. Jones (SBN 290660)
[e-mail]
Brian W. Cook (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant
ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Dated: November 25, 2014

By: /s/Aaron Allan (with permission)
Patricia L. Glaser
[e-mail]
Fred D. Heather
[e-mail]
Aaron Allan
[e-mail]
GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO
LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard,
19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.

25
26
27
28
2