LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated
Filing
207
Joint STIPULATION to Vacate Trial Date and Revising Schedule for Completing Discovery and Filing Summary Judgment Motions filed by Defendant Rocket Lawyer Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Forrest A. Hainline III (SBN 64166)
fhainline@goodwinprocter.com
Hong-An Vu (SBN 266268)
hvu@goodwinprocter.com
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: 415.733.6000
Fax.: 415.677.9041
Michael T. Jones (SBN 290660)
mjones@goodwinprocter.com
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025-1105
Tel.: 650.752.3100
Fax.: 650.853.1038
Brian W. Cook (Pro Hac Vice)
bcook@goodwinprocter.com
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
53 State Street
Boston, MA 02109-2802
Tel.: 617.570.1000
Fax.: 617.523.1231
Attorneys for Defendant
ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware Case No. 2:12-cv-09942-GAF-AGR
corporation,
JOINT STIPULATION VACATING
Plaintiff,
TRIAL DATE AND REVISING
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING
v.
DISCOVERY AND FILING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS
ROCKET LAWYER
INCORPORATED, a Delaware
Judge:
Judge John E. McDermott
corporation,
Courtroom: 312 N. Spring Street,
Courtroom C, 8th Floor
Defendant.
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Action Filed: November 20, 2012
26
27
28
985909.1
WHEREAS an order entered in this case on November 10, 2014 (the “Prior
1
2
Order”), granted a stipulation of the parties to take additional limited discovery from
3
each other and from third parties, including Google, Inc., as a means to supplement
4
the record for purposes of briefing cross-motions for summary judgment;
WHEREAS the Prior Order required the close of additional limited discovery
5
6
by January 16, 2015, a deadline to supplement the record of February 2, 2015, a
7
hearing date on cross motions for summary judgment of February 23, 2015, and a
8
trial date of April 21, 2015;
WHEREAS LegalZoom.com, Inc., represents that it (a) has been unable to
9
10
complete all of the contemplated third party discovery necessary to supplement the
11
record, (b) has on January 5, 2015, filed in the Northern District of California a
12
motion to compel a document production by Google, Inc., and (c) contemplates at
13
least one additional motion to compel deposition testimony by an employee of
14
Google Ventures, named Michael Margolis, to be filed in the Western District of
15
Washington;
WHEREAS the parties appeared at a case status conference on January 7,
16
17
2015, to discuss the case schedule and the anticipated completion date for discovery
18
from Google, Inc. and others;
19
WHEREAS the Court suggested, and the parties agreed, that a new schedule
20
for supplementing the record and hearing summary judgment motions be agreed to
21
by the parties and submitted to the Court for approval.
THEREFORE, Plaintiff and counterclaim defendant LegalZoom.com, Inc.
22
23
and defendant and counterclaimant Rocket Lawyer Incorporated hereby stipulate as
24
follows:
25
1.
26
The parties shall appear before Magistrate Judge Segal for a Settlement
Conference on March 17, 2015.
27
28
985909.1
1
2.
The new deadline for completing additional discovery from third
2
parties, which remains subject to the category and witness limits of the Prior Order,
3
is May 19, 2015.
4
3.
Upon learning that the completion of third party discovery is either not
5
possible or very unlikely by the May19, 2015, deadline, counsel shall notify the
6
opposing party and the Court, and may, no later than April 24, 2015, file a request
7
seeking an additional extension of the deadlines provided by this stipulation and
8
order.
9
4.
Upon completing all third party discovery, the parties may submit new
10
cross-motions for summary judgment (which will supersede prior summary
11
judgment filings) on or before June 12, 2015.
5.
13
Summary judgment reply briefs shall be due on or before July 17,
7.
A hearing to decide the summary judgment motions shall be held on
2015.
14
15
Summary judgment opposition briefs shall be due on or before July 3,
6.
12
2015.
16
17
August 10, 2015, or as soon thereafter as the Court’s calendar permits. At that
18
hearing, the Court shall also hear argument concerning the Rule 11 motion
19
previously brought by LegalZoom and briefed by the parties.
20
8.
One week after the hearing on summary judgment motions, the Court
21
shall conduct a status conference at which a new trial date and new dates for all
22
pretrial filings shall be set.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
985909.1
1
Dated: January 13, 2015
2
Respectfully submitted,
By: Michael T. Jones
Forrest A. Hainline III
fhainline@goodwinprocter.com
Hong-An Vu (SBN 266268)
hvu@goodwinprocter.com
Michael T. Jones (SBN 290660)
mjones@goodwinprocter.com
Brian W. Cook (Pro Hac Vice)
bcook@goodwinprocter.com
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: 415.733.6000
Fax.: 415.677.9041
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant
ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED
11
12
13
Dated: January 13, 2015
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
By: /s/Patricia L. Glaser
(with permission)
Patricia L. Glaser
pglaser@glaserweil.com
Fred D. Heather
fheather@glaserweil.com
Aaron Allan
aallan@glaserweil.com
GLASER WEIL FINK HOWARD
AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard,
19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Tel.: (310) 553-3000
Fax.: (310) 556-2920
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
985909.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?