Maria Garcia v. Reebok International Ltd et al

Filing 6

MINUTE: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Remand: Accordingly, Reebok has failed to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that Plaintiff's combined value of damages exceeds $75,000. Thus, the Court finds that removal is improperand REMANDS th is action to state court IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge R. Gary Klausner (cc Copy of Minute Order, docket sheet and Letter of Remand sent to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case number BC499824) (Case Terminated. Made JS-6) (Attachments: # 1 Letter of Remand-CV103) (ir)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION TERRY NAFISI District Court Executive and Clerk of Court SOUTHERN DIVISION 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3535 411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4750 EASTERN DIVISION 3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450 Date: April 5, 2013 Los Angeles Superior Court Civil Filing Unit, Room 102 111 North Hill Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re: Case Number: 2:13-Cv-01641 RGK (PJWx) Previously Superior Court Case No. BC499824 Case Name: Maria Garcia v. Reebok International Ltd et al Dear Sir / Madam: Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on April 5, 2013 above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction. , the Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this Court. Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to our office. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Clerk, U. S. District Court By: Irene Ramirez Deputy Clerk G Western ✘ 213-894-2877 G Eastern G Southern Division cc: Counsel of record Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein. Clerk, Superior Court By: Date CV - 103 (09/08) Deputy Clerk LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?