Tenita Bell v. Bayview Loan Servicing et al
Filing
7
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court finds that First Tennessee Bank failed to establish either federal-question or diversity jurisdiction. The Court thus REMANDS this case to Los Angeles Co unty Superior Court. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.. cc: order, docket, remand letter to Los Angeles Superior Court, South Central District, Case number TC 027104 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 remand letter) (lc). Modified on 4/9/2013 .(lc).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
SOUTHERN DIVISION
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
(714) 338-4750
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRY NAFISI
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 328-4450
Date 4/9/13
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT
SOUTH CENTRAL DISTRICT
COMPTON COURTHOUSE
200 WEST COMPTON, BLVD.
COMPTON, CA 90220
Re: Case Number: 2:13-cv-02238-ODW-MRW
Previously Superior Court Case No. TC027104
Case Name: Tenita Bell v. Bayview Loan Servicing et al
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on 4/8/13
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Court.
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: L Chai
Deputy Clerk
G Western
✘
213-894-5730
G Eastern
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
By:
Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?