The Melissa D Duflock Revocable Trust v. Chevron Corporation et al

Filing 34

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge S. James Otero: Proceedings: ORDER GRANTING MOTION to Remand Case 18 ; DENYING MOTION to Dismiss Case 25 . Case is remanded to San Luis Obispo Superior Court, Case number CV130147 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 CV-103) (mg)

Download PDF
The Melissa D Duflock Revocable Trust v. Chevron Corporation et al Doc. 34 Att. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION SOUTHERN DIVISION 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3535 411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4750 EASTERN DIVISION TERRY NAFISI 3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450 August 14, 2013 District Court Executive and Clerk of Court San Luis Obispo Superior Court County Government Center 1035 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 Re: Case Number: CV 13-3177 SJO (SHx) Previously Superior Court Case No. CV130147 Case Name: The Melissa D Duflock Revocable Trust v. Chevron Corporation et al Dear Sir / Madam: Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on August 14, 2013 above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction. , the Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this Court. Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to our office. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Clerk, U. S. District Court By: madelina_guerrero@cacd.uscourts.gov Deputy Clerk 213-894-8242 G Western ✘ G Eastern G Southern Division cc: Counsel of record Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein. Clerk, Superior Court By: Date CV - 103 (09/08) Deputy Clerk LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?