Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc
Filing
157
MEMORANDUM in Support /MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILNERS ORDER RE: DISCOVERY MOTION DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO OVERRULE DEFENDANTS CLAIM OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE filed by Defendant Warner Chappell Music Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration DECLARATION OF KELLY M. KLAUS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILNERS ORDER RE: DISCOVERY MOTION DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO OVERRULE DEFENDANTS CLAIM OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, # 2 Exhibit A to K. Klaus Declaration, # 3 Exhibit B - Under Seal, # 4 Exhibit C - Under Seal, # 5 Exhibit D to K. Klaus Declaration, # 6 Exhibit E to K. Klaus Declaration, # 7 Exhibit F to K. Klaus Declaration)(Klaus, Kelly)
Exhibit A
Page 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL
2
DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
WESTERN DIVISION
4
5
GOOD MORNING TO YOU
PRODUCTIONS CORP., et al.,
6
Plaintiffs,
7
Lead Case Number
CV 13-04460-GHK
vs.
(MRWx)
8
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC INC.,
9
et al. ,
Defendants.
10
11
12
13
14
DEPOSITION OF JEREMY BLIETZ
15
Los Angeles, California
16
Thursday, July 10, 2014
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Job No: 81817
24
Reported by:
25
NIKKI ROY
CSR No. 3052
TSG Reporting· Worldwide
877·702-9580
l
Page 45
1
Q.
And who at Warner/Chappell would make the
2
judgment as to whether something is an arrangement or
3
not an arrangement?
MS. LeMOINE:
4
5
registration?
6
7
MS. MANIFOLD:
For the purposes of the
Warner/Chappell songbook database.
8
9
For the purposes of
MS. LeMOINE:
Just it's vague.
I don't know
what that means.
10
You can answer the question.
11
THE WITNESS:
As I understand the question,
12
I would say it would be a legal department question.
13
BY MS. MANIFOLD:
14
·15
'Q.
Okay,
And in looking at ):Ccensing
•arranqements with, for example, ASCAP, d,o
}'()U
look at>
'i
whether it's an arraJJ.\J'§!ment or an oil~inal mus cai)
17
composition?
18
19
MS. LeMOINE:
Objection; vague.
It lacks
foundation, calls for SI?eculation:
20
THE WITNESS:,
21
.it's a question o:( whether: the creators and the
22.
publishers invoiy~d are .A_~~AP mernJ::ie~rs~ and,
.2 3 ;
are, we would look to ASCAP to license rights thai::
24
they would typically license on our behalf. 1
25
Ill
877-702-9580
I
I
I
In terms of ASC.A_P, . fen::. us,)
TSG Reporting- Worldwide
I
I
ifiJ::te:¥
i
Page 46
1
MS. MANIFOLD:
Okay.
I'd like to place in
2
front of the witness an exhibit that's been
3
previously marked as Plaintiffs' Exhibit 41.
4
for identification.
5
6
And I apologize.
So 41 ·
The exhibit label really
does say 41, but the copy is quite badly copied.
7
And it,
for the record,
is a Stock Purchase
8
Agreement between Warner/Chappell Music and David K.
9
Sengstack.
If I said that wrong,
I apologize.
And
10
it is Bates-stamped WC 760 to 827.
11
the copy we've been using as an exhibit, not all the
12
Bates stamping came through on the copying, so there
13
may be some pages without a Bates stamp, but I can
14
represent to you that this is a consistent copy of
15
the exhibit, and at some point I'll discuss with
16
defendants substituting Exhibit 41 with a complete
17
Bates-stamped copy, but we can look at this document
18
with the numbers at the top, which would be on the
19
upper right-hand corner.
Unfortunately,
20
Q.
Have you seen this document before?
21
A.
Yes,
22
Q.
And in what context did you last see it?
23
A.
As I recall, it was in the song file and was
I have.
24
a document that I copied as part of the document
25
review process.
TSG Reporting· Worldwide
877·702-9580
Page 157
1
MS. MANIFOLD:
2
MS. LeMOINE:
3
MS. MANIFOLD:
4
All right.
We're off the record.
We are off the record.
(Recess held 3:13p.m. to 3:43p.m.)
5
EXAMINATION
6
7
BY MS. LeMOINE:
8
Q.
.All rigb.t., (if
xou
9
A.
.AS CAP is owned
l:J:y: its members,
10
11
kn.ow,
who owns AS CAP
INh~ch are thee
writers and I-Jublls-b.ers wb.icb. are affiliated
Q.
w:i. t:h Tt ~'
And earlier Ms. Manifold asked you, did you
12
interact with ASCAP at all with regard to
13
unauthorized reproduction and distribution.
14
recall that?
15
MS. MANIFOLD:
16
THE WITNESS:
17
18
19
Do you
Objection; leading.
I do recall the question, yes.
BY MS. LeMOINE:
Q.
Are you the only person at Warner/Chappell
who interacts with ASCAP?
20
A.
No, I'm not.
21
Q.
Who else at Warner/Chappell interacts with
22
23
AS CAP?
A.
As I understand it, our legal department
24
interacts with ASCAP, our creative department
25
interacts with ASCAP, and our executive departments
TSG Reporting- Worldwide
877-702-9580
Page 158
1
interact with ASCAP.
2
3
Q.
And can you tell me what does the legal
department interact with ASCAP for,
4
MS. MANIFOLD:
5
You can answer.
6
Ambiguous.
Sorry,
BY MS. LeMOINE:
7
8
if you know?
Q.
What's the nature of ASCAP in :Your legal}
-department?
9
A.-
..
----
··-··
,I would say in general terms, when issues
10
relate to rights that are rep:r::esented hy ASCAP,':
11
there's a common interest between Warner/Chappell and'
,12
ASCAP to address those matters in terms o(
13
litigating -- not litigatin<;r ::-- bt1t a,s I2l1f3hin<;r for)
14
.artist :r:ight§ 'or scmg~~rt:e:r ri~ilts' ~ w:3,£ii_e:!/_¢:ila:P:rJeli\
'is:
:works with ASCAP
16,
:1a.w-.
in
try~~q tci_ ::;t::rengt:ll:E~I1_ S:()k>Y:r:Jghf
'17
:we have a shared--interest in intellectual
.......... ___ -·
property rights, and so commonly we're working
-18
together to -- to support those rights for'.
19
songwriters and publishers .1
'"
20
21
Q.
24
25
MS. MANIFOLD:
Objection; form.
I
•
BY MS. LeMOINE:
Q.
1
And so in your role in the administration
department, what role do you provide?
22
23
__
What do you provide as the person in charge)
of the administration department?'
l
I
~--------------------------------~-----------='J
TSG Reporting- Worldwide
877-702-9580
Page 159
1
MS. MANIFOLD: . )unbiguous. •
2
THE WITNESS: . In terms of
I
3
MS. MANIFOLD: · Go ahead ..
4
THE WITNESS:
5
\In terms of administration, m:::,r
area is. responsible for the registration of works at
ASCAP. . We also h)rovide them c:gpies o{ CO;P::,rrig~l~)
certificates when they requir:E! t;he~ for ~iitig(it~()n,
T
they're. pursuing or imi:sul t o:E rionu~e
9
?:r
nonilcensin~·
o:fworks when requested. • (So su,ppcn·tTn teJ::1lls of the
catalog that we've regis tei:e(f with them.
BY MS. LeMOINE:
1
12
Q.
And without
without gE!ttlng ir1t;o Cil1::(
13
detail, if there was -- if there is a litigation or a.
14
t.Jen(ling litigation reg(ird~rlg _a11 unauthoi:Ized use ____o_,~-::...... c.·/
15
work; are there . occasions when :you would _provi(ie)
16.
'information?•
1i
18
MS. MANIFOLD:
•o:b]ec:t:.ion; oU.tsid.ethe scope.·
BY MS. LeMOINE: .
19
.Q.
.To provide information?•
2o:
A.·
Yes.
Based on direction from the i~~9"13.i')
21.
department:., I hay~_ provided cop:j:r:Ig.ht:_ ~~J:-t:I:Elcat§s!
2 2·
and internal Information
23
MS. LeMOINE:
to
ASCAP as requeste-d~:
Okay.
That's all I have.
24.
25
TSG Reporting- Worldwide
877-702-9580
Page 160
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
EXAMINATION
BY MS. MANIFOLD:
Q.
During the break, did you discuss your
counsel's cross-examination?
A.
Just we spoke generally.
Didn't discuss any
specifics about it.
Q.
What did you discuss generally?
8
MS. LeMOINE:
9
invades the privilege.
10
11
MS. MANIFOLD:
Objection to the extent it
With open testimony, I'm
entitled to know what you talked about.
12
THE WITNESS:
13
company.
14
Talked about my role in the
BY MS. MANIFOLD:
15
Q.
And with regard to the word "common
16
interest," did you use that word or did your counsel
17
use that word?
18
19
20
21
A.
It's a word I've heard used within the
company, and I've used it myself.
Q.
Did counsel mention the word "common
interest" to you in the conversation?
22
A.
No, I mentioned the word "common interest."
23
Q.
Okay.
Other than the discussion of your
24
role at the company, was there any other discussion
25
with counsel?
TSG Reporting· Worldwide
877-702-9580
Page 161
1
A.
Not with me.
2
Q.
During the break, did counsel ask you to
3
testify in any specific way?
4
A.
No.
5
Q.
Did counsel mention whether you should
6
discuss your role with regard to pending litigation
7
at ASCAP?
8
A.
No.
9
Q.
Who else at the company interacts with
10
11
ASCAP?
A.
Our creative departments interact with ASCAP
12
to sign writers.
13
the legal department at ASCAP on matters that would
14
be handled there, and people within the company are
15
actually on the board of directors, and they're
16
involved on the executive side.
Our legal departments interact with
17
Q.
And how do you know who owns ASCAP?
18
A.
How do I -- I'm sorry?
19
Q.
What's the basis for your information of the
2o
21
owners of ASCAP?
A.
It's a basic understanding of the company
22
that it is owned by its members, that it is a
23
nonprofit.
24
2s
Q.
And Warner/ChaL)pell is.considered a member
of ASCAP; is ~6at correct?'
TSG Reporting- Worldwide
877-702-9580
I
I
Page 162
1
2
3
4
.5
6
A.
We have our company, WB Music CO:t:'J?., ,:
affiliated as a member of ASCAP ..
Q.
And the writers and publishers that Y()_11~'
represent, are they also inc1ividual members of ASCAPi
.A.·'
Songwriters can affiliate with a!ly_of the .
.three performing rigl11:s soc:ieties :i.n the url._lted)
... _..
7
States, so some of our writers are at ASCAP, some are•
8
at BMI' and some are at SESAC..
9
10
11
12
I COl.J.ld
So
saY:
t::haf
.those writer memb.ers that are ASCAP members are_also
owners of the organization.
Q.
And does Warner/Chappell use any of the)
other performing rights societies?'
13
A ..
Yes, we do.
14.
,Q.
So it would be accurate to
We use all three.,
sax.1:l1Cit: ASCAP is':
15,
not your exclusive perfo~Il\irl.g rigl1ts society; . is that:'
16
.
correct ?'
..
17
.A.
We have companies set up at each of the\
18
three societies to represent rights that songwriters
19
own, so we follow the affiliaj:ion society of the'
20
songwriter ..
21
Q.
.22
'A.;
'23
BMI company.
24
our SESAC compai1y., rn' s really the fact that writers)
25
can affiliate with any ofthe three, that weneedt;_c)
.Okay.
--------------·
.
-
----~-
.
So when we a sign a BMI writer, we use our•
When we a sign a SESAC writer' we u'se\
TSG Reporting- Worldwide
877-702-9580
Page 163
1
2
3
'he members of all three societies ..'
Q.
And what role, if any, is AS CAP role in'
pending litigation, toyourknowledge?
4
A.·
.To my knowledge, ASCAP pursues Iiti.ga:i::ioi1~
7
Q.
And what's your role, if any, in providing
8
information to ASCAP with regard to pending
9
litigation?
10
A.
So ASCAP comes to me on occasion and asks
11
for copies of copyright certificates, and I provide
12
them with copies.
13
'14
Q.
That's the extent of it.
What ' s your understanding of . what the common
.interest is between ASCAP and Warner /Cha:r;Jpell?
A.
16
organization and we both represent intellectuaL
17
property rights, the common interest is that they're:
is
representing writers and publishersto :protect those
19
intellectual.property rights to ensure.that in cases:
,20
where they 're_us~d they're be~Il:g~LLcei1secLJ
,21
a common-interest
.22
intellec'tual property and that of our songwriters.
23
24
25
Q.
In
.so
t~at_' s;
the ~i)~()Fection of ou~)
ASCAP doesn't own any intellectual property;
is that correct?
A.
ASCAP doesn't own the rights, no.
- '"'"'' ''" '"" ......___,,_____.__ ~-----..-----~·- .,,,,,___, ,,_______,,,JJ'
TSG Reporting- Worldwide
877-702-9580
Page 164
1
MS. LeMOINE:
2
It calls for a
legal conclusion ..
3
Objection.
BY MS. MANIFOLD:
4
5
6
7
8
9
Q.
on the royalties; is that correct?
A.
Can you clarify that question, when you say
"own the rights"?
Q.
What rights does ASCAP have with regard to
the collection of royalties?
10
11
And ASCAP doesn't own any rights to collect
MS. LeMOINE:
Objection based on it calls
for a legal conclusion.
12
But you may answer.
13
THE WITNESS:
ASCAP is entitled to collect
14
and license our performance rights, and they acquire
15
that right through our affiliation agreements.
16
BY MS. MANIFOLD:
17
Q.
How does ASCAP license performance rights?
18
A.
I'm not knowledgeable of their specific
19
handle on our behalf and on behalf of, you know,
21
thousands of other publishers and songwriters.
j
internal practices, but it is a right that they
20
l
22
Q.
What information do you routinely --
23
routinely -- what information do you routinely
24
provide for ASCAP
25
certificate that you just mentioned?
I
1
I
l
to ASCAP, other than the routine
I
~==========-==--=--=-======================================~"~
TSG Reporting- Worldwide
877-702-9580
Page 165
1
A.
Sure.
The most common information is
2
registrations.
3
performance registrations.
4
writers, publishing information to them in electronic
5
files biweekly, which updates them on what new works
6
we've acquired, what works in our catalog- have
7
changed, and then they electronically process them
8
and include them as part of the works they represent
9
on our behalf.
10
Q.
And when I say registrations, I mean
So we submit titles,
I
Do you know how, if any, the electronic
11
files that you send them would differ from the public
12
database that Warner/Chappell provides with regard to
13
information of the catalogs they represent?
14
A.
It would be consistent.
15
Q.
_And is i t your understanding that ASCAP,
16
actually brings litigation on behalf of ir1.d.ivid.uaf
17
writers and publishers?,
18
A.•
That is my under-standing; yes .
19
Q.
So rather than have WarnerjC:ttCl,P:PeTl·b~ii1~J
20'
directly an infrir1~ement rig:ht _acti()I1• _t:hat actJ()ili
21
would be brought by ASCAP?i
22
-·-
A.
-
-
----
-
In terms of performing riQ"hts,they're'•
23
acting on our behalf, 8() the-y, as i understand it,
24
bring action on behalf of all of the members.
25
oftentimes-- for larger cases i t ' s on behalf of all
TSG Reporting- Worldwide
877-702-9580
So
I
I
Page 166
1
2
ASCAP members, which. we wouldbe included in.
.Q.
I'm talking with regard . to SI,Jecific:
performing rights.
5
.Let's :te1.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?