Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 157

MEMORANDUM in Support /MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILNERS ORDER RE: DISCOVERY MOTION DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO OVERRULE DEFENDANTS CLAIM OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE filed by Defendant Warner Chappell Music Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration DECLARATION OF KELLY M. KLAUS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILNERS ORDER RE: DISCOVERY MOTION DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO OVERRULE DEFENDANTS CLAIM OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, # 2 Exhibit A to K. Klaus Declaration, # 3 Exhibit B - Under Seal, # 4 Exhibit C - Under Seal, # 5 Exhibit D to K. Klaus Declaration, # 6 Exhibit E to K. Klaus Declaration, # 7 Exhibit F to K. Klaus Declaration)(Klaus, Kelly)

Download PDF
Exhibit A Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL 2 DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 WESTERN DIVISION 4 5 GOOD MORNING TO YOU PRODUCTIONS CORP., et al., 6 Plaintiffs, 7 Lead Case Number CV 13-04460-GHK vs. (MRWx) 8 WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC INC., 9 et al. , Defendants. 10 11 12 13 14 DEPOSITION OF JEREMY BLIETZ 15 Los Angeles, California 16 Thursday, July 10, 2014 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Job No: 81817 24 Reported by: 25 NIKKI ROY CSR No. 3052 TSG Reporting· Worldwide 877·702-9580 l Page 45 1 Q. And who at Warner/Chappell would make the 2 judgment as to whether something is an arrangement or 3 not an arrangement? MS. LeMOINE: 4 5 registration? 6 7 MS. MANIFOLD: For the purposes of the Warner/Chappell songbook database. 8 9 For the purposes of MS. LeMOINE: Just it's vague. I don't know what that means. 10 You can answer the question. 11 THE WITNESS: As I understand the question, 12 I would say it would be a legal department question. 13 BY MS. MANIFOLD: 14 ·15 'Q. Okay, And in looking at ):Ccensing •arranqements with, for example, ASCAP, d,o }'()U look at> 'i whether it's an arraJJ.\J'§!ment or an oil~inal mus cai) 17 composition? 18 19 MS. LeMOINE: Objection; vague. It lacks foundation, calls for SI?eculation: 20 THE WITNESS:, 21 .it's a question o:( whether: the creators and the 22. publishers invoiy~d are .A_~~AP mernJ::ie~rs~ and, .2 3 ; are, we would look to ASCAP to license rights thai:: 24 they would typically license on our behalf. 1 25 Ill 877-702-9580 I I I In terms of ASC.A_P, . fen::. us,) TSG Reporting- Worldwide I I ifiJ::te:¥ i Page 46 1 MS. MANIFOLD: Okay. I'd like to place in 2 front of the witness an exhibit that's been 3 previously marked as Plaintiffs' Exhibit 41. 4 for identification. 5 6 And I apologize. So 41 · The exhibit label really does say 41, but the copy is quite badly copied. 7 And it, for the record, is a Stock Purchase 8 Agreement between Warner/Chappell Music and David K. 9 Sengstack. If I said that wrong, I apologize. And 10 it is Bates-stamped WC 760 to 827. 11 the copy we've been using as an exhibit, not all the 12 Bates stamping came through on the copying, so there 13 may be some pages without a Bates stamp, but I can 14 represent to you that this is a consistent copy of 15 the exhibit, and at some point I'll discuss with 16 defendants substituting Exhibit 41 with a complete 17 Bates-stamped copy, but we can look at this document 18 with the numbers at the top, which would be on the 19 upper right-hand corner. Unfortunately, 20 Q. Have you seen this document before? 21 A. Yes, 22 Q. And in what context did you last see it? 23 A. As I recall, it was in the song file and was I have. 24 a document that I copied as part of the document 25 review process. TSG Reporting· Worldwide 877·702-9580 Page 157 1 MS. MANIFOLD: 2 MS. LeMOINE: 3 MS. MANIFOLD: 4 All right. We're off the record. We are off the record. (Recess held 3:13p.m. to 3:43p.m.) 5 EXAMINATION 6 7 BY MS. LeMOINE: 8 Q. .All rigb.t., (if xou 9 A. .AS CAP is owned l:J:y: its members, 10 11 kn.ow, who owns AS CAP INh~ch are thee writers and I-Jublls-b.ers wb.icb. are affiliated Q. w:i. t:h Tt ~' And earlier Ms. Manifold asked you, did you 12 interact with ASCAP at all with regard to 13 unauthorized reproduction and distribution. 14 recall that? 15 MS. MANIFOLD: 16 THE WITNESS: 17 18 19 Do you Objection; leading. I do recall the question, yes. BY MS. LeMOINE: Q. Are you the only person at Warner/Chappell who interacts with ASCAP? 20 A. No, I'm not. 21 Q. Who else at Warner/Chappell interacts with 22 23 AS CAP? A. As I understand it, our legal department 24 interacts with ASCAP, our creative department 25 interacts with ASCAP, and our executive departments TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 158 1 interact with ASCAP. 2 3 Q. And can you tell me what does the legal department interact with ASCAP for, 4 MS. MANIFOLD: 5 You can answer. 6 Ambiguous. Sorry, BY MS. LeMOINE: 7 8 if you know? Q. What's the nature of ASCAP in :Your legal} -department? 9 A.- .. ---- ··-·· ,I would say in general terms, when issues 10 relate to rights that are rep:r::esented hy ASCAP,': 11 there's a common interest between Warner/Chappell and' ,12 ASCAP to address those matters in terms o( 13 litigating -- not litigatin<;r ::-- bt1t a,s I2l1f3hin<;r for) 14 .artist :r:ight§ 'or scmg~~rt:e:r ri~ilts' ~ w:3,£ii_e:!/_¢:ila:P:rJeli\ 'is: :works with ASCAP 16, :1a.w-. in try~~q tci_ ::;t::rengt:ll:E~I1_ S:()k>Y:r:Jghf '17 :we have a shared--interest in intellectual .......... ___ -· property rights, and so commonly we're working -18 together to -- to support those rights for'. 19 songwriters and publishers .1 '" 20 21 Q. 24 25 MS. MANIFOLD: Objection; form. I • BY MS. LeMOINE: Q. 1 And so in your role in the administration department, what role do you provide? 22 23 __ What do you provide as the person in charge) of the administration department?' l I ~--------------------------------~-----------='J TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 159 1 MS. MANIFOLD: . )unbiguous. • 2 THE WITNESS: . In terms of I 3 MS. MANIFOLD: · Go ahead .. 4 THE WITNESS: 5 \In terms of administration, m:::,r area is. responsible for the registration of works at ASCAP. . We also h)rovide them c:gpies o{ CO;P::,rrig~l~) certificates when they requir:E! t;he~ for ~iitig(it~()n, T they're. pursuing or imi:sul t o:E rionu~e 9 ?:r nonilcensin~· o:fworks when requested. • (So su,ppcn·tTn teJ::1lls of the catalog that we've regis tei:e(f with them. BY MS. LeMOINE: 1 12 Q. And without without gE!ttlng ir1t;o Cil1::( 13 detail, if there was -- if there is a litigation or a. 14 t.Jen(ling litigation reg(ird~rlg _a11 unauthoi:Ized use ____o_,~-::...... c.·/ 15 work; are there . occasions when :you would _provi(ie) 16. 'information?• 1i 18 MS. MANIFOLD: •o:b]ec:t:.ion; oU.tsid.ethe scope.· BY MS. LeMOINE: . 19 .Q. .To provide information?• 2o: A.· Yes. Based on direction from the i~~9"13.i') 21. department:., I hay~_ provided cop:j:r:Ig.ht:_ ~~J:-t:I:Elcat§s! 2 2· and internal Information 23 MS. LeMOINE: to ASCAP as requeste-d~: Okay. That's all I have. 24. 25 TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 160 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EXAMINATION BY MS. MANIFOLD: Q. During the break, did you discuss your counsel's cross-examination? A. Just we spoke generally. Didn't discuss any specifics about it. Q. What did you discuss generally? 8 MS. LeMOINE: 9 invades the privilege. 10 11 MS. MANIFOLD: Objection to the extent it With open testimony, I'm entitled to know what you talked about. 12 THE WITNESS: 13 company. 14 Talked about my role in the BY MS. MANIFOLD: 15 Q. And with regard to the word "common 16 interest," did you use that word or did your counsel 17 use that word? 18 19 20 21 A. It's a word I've heard used within the company, and I've used it myself. Q. Did counsel mention the word "common interest" to you in the conversation? 22 A. No, I mentioned the word "common interest." 23 Q. Okay. Other than the discussion of your 24 role at the company, was there any other discussion 25 with counsel? TSG Reporting· Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 161 1 A. Not with me. 2 Q. During the break, did counsel ask you to 3 testify in any specific way? 4 A. No. 5 Q. Did counsel mention whether you should 6 discuss your role with regard to pending litigation 7 at ASCAP? 8 A. No. 9 Q. Who else at the company interacts with 10 11 ASCAP? A. Our creative departments interact with ASCAP 12 to sign writers. 13 the legal department at ASCAP on matters that would 14 be handled there, and people within the company are 15 actually on the board of directors, and they're 16 involved on the executive side. Our legal departments interact with 17 Q. And how do you know who owns ASCAP? 18 A. How do I -- I'm sorry? 19 Q. What's the basis for your information of the 2o 21 owners of ASCAP? A. It's a basic understanding of the company 22 that it is owned by its members, that it is a 23 nonprofit. 24 2s Q. And Warner/ChaL)pell is.considered a member of ASCAP; is ~6at correct?' TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 I I Page 162 1 2 3 4 .5 6 A. We have our company, WB Music CO:t:'J?., ,: affiliated as a member of ASCAP .. Q. And the writers and publishers that Y()_11~' represent, are they also inc1ividual members of ASCAPi .A.·' Songwriters can affiliate with a!ly_of the . .three performing rigl11:s soc:ieties :i.n the url._lted) ... _.. 7 States, so some of our writers are at ASCAP, some are• 8 at BMI' and some are at SESAC.. 9 10 11 12 I COl.J.ld So saY: t::haf .those writer memb.ers that are ASCAP members are_also owners of the organization. Q. And does Warner/Chappell use any of the) other performing rights societies?' 13 A .. Yes, we do. 14. ,Q. So it would be accurate to We use all three., sax.1:l1Cit: ASCAP is': 15, not your exclusive perfo~Il\irl.g rigl1ts society; . is that:' 16 . correct ?' .. 17 .A. We have companies set up at each of the\ 18 three societies to represent rights that songwriters 19 own, so we follow the affiliaj:ion society of the' 20 songwriter .. 21 Q. .22 'A.; '23 BMI company. 24 our SESAC compai1y., rn' s really the fact that writers) 25 can affiliate with any ofthe three, that weneedt;_c) .Okay. --------------· . - ----~- . So when we a sign a BMI writer, we use our• When we a sign a SESAC writer' we u'se\ TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 163 1 2 3 'he members of all three societies ..' Q. And what role, if any, is AS CAP role in' pending litigation, toyourknowledge? 4 A.· .To my knowledge, ASCAP pursues Iiti.ga:i::ioi1~ 7 Q. And what's your role, if any, in providing 8 information to ASCAP with regard to pending 9 litigation? 10 A. So ASCAP comes to me on occasion and asks 11 for copies of copyright certificates, and I provide 12 them with copies. 13 '14 Q. That's the extent of it. What ' s your understanding of . what the common .interest is between ASCAP and Warner /Cha:r;Jpell? A. 16 organization and we both represent intellectuaL 17 property rights, the common interest is that they're: is representing writers and publishersto :protect those 19 intellectual.property rights to ensure.that in cases: ,20 where they 're_us~d they're be~Il:g~LLcei1secLJ ,21 a common-interest .22 intellec'tual property and that of our songwriters. 23 24 25 Q. In .so t~at_' s; the ~i)~()Fection of ou~) ASCAP doesn't own any intellectual property; is that correct? A. ASCAP doesn't own the rights, no. - '"'"'' ''" '"" ......___,,_____.__ ~-----..-----~·- .,,,,,___, ,,_______,,,JJ' TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 164 1 MS. LeMOINE: 2 It calls for a legal conclusion .. 3 Objection. BY MS. MANIFOLD: 4 5 6 7 8 9 Q. on the royalties; is that correct? A. Can you clarify that question, when you say "own the rights"? Q. What rights does ASCAP have with regard to the collection of royalties? 10 11 And ASCAP doesn't own any rights to collect MS. LeMOINE: Objection based on it calls for a legal conclusion. 12 But you may answer. 13 THE WITNESS: ASCAP is entitled to collect 14 and license our performance rights, and they acquire 15 that right through our affiliation agreements. 16 BY MS. MANIFOLD: 17 Q. How does ASCAP license performance rights? 18 A. I'm not knowledgeable of their specific 19 handle on our behalf and on behalf of, you know, 21 thousands of other publishers and songwriters. j internal practices, but it is a right that they 20 l 22 Q. What information do you routinely -- 23 routinely -- what information do you routinely 24 provide for ASCAP 25 certificate that you just mentioned? I 1 I l to ASCAP, other than the routine I ~==========-==--=--=-======================================~"~ TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 165 1 A. Sure. The most common information is 2 registrations. 3 performance registrations. 4 writers, publishing information to them in electronic 5 files biweekly, which updates them on what new works 6 we've acquired, what works in our catalog- have 7 changed, and then they electronically process them 8 and include them as part of the works they represent 9 on our behalf. 10 Q. And when I say registrations, I mean So we submit titles, I Do you know how, if any, the electronic 11 files that you send them would differ from the public 12 database that Warner/Chappell provides with regard to 13 information of the catalogs they represent? 14 A. It would be consistent. 15 Q. _And is i t your understanding that ASCAP, 16 actually brings litigation on behalf of ir1.d.ivid.uaf 17 writers and publishers?, 18 A.• That is my under-standing; yes . 19 Q. So rather than have WarnerjC:ttCl,P:PeTl·b~ii1~J 20' directly an infrir1~ement rig:ht _acti()I1• _t:hat actJ()ili 21 would be brought by ASCAP?i 22 -·- A. - - ---- - In terms of performing riQ"hts,they're'• 23 acting on our behalf, 8() the-y, as i understand it, 24 bring action on behalf of all of the members. 25 oftentimes-- for larger cases i t ' s on behalf of all TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 So I I Page 166 1 2 ASCAP members, which. we wouldbe included in. .Q. I'm talking with regard . to SI,Jecific: performing rights. 5 .Let's :te1.)<e, :for exami,Jle, j'OU krlow Hap];)y Birthda:r i~ perfor!U~<:I ~n Broadwax and it• s~ .. ······- -·- ----- . --considered to be a vio1Cl_ti<)r1, an infringement of one of War!ler/Chapi,JelJ.; s cop:{rights:; WJ:"J.o 1 would --- who would file the enforcement action?, MS. LeMOINE: • Well, objection to the extent· 9 i t calls for a- leg-alconc:L\lsi.on.\ 1You're talk.ing ,·there ~- that would be grand rights, wJ:lich is noi::'i i1 within ASCAP' s .. (rt' s-outs~cfet:he ·-sc;o];)~. 12 MS. MANIFOLD: 13 _MS. LeMOINE: 14. (of.hat' s what i•m Ci<lk.i.!lg-J We~l, it's o11:tsic'le tJ::le scoi:Je" -- -- .. .. - --- of ASCAP though.· 'ASCAP doesn't control grand rights. Performing rights_are different. 16 i.MS. MANIFOLD: asking the_(illest:ion. 18 '.J: __ g-et tJ::lat: - .. -- (rrha t • s - wl:J.y i · m) --- I'd like the answer from the witness.· 19 THE WITNESS:. ASCAP represents our 20 performance rights, not our grancf rTghts ..· 21 BY MS. MANIFOLD: 22 23 Q. I Performance of our music in a venue on the· I right. A. 25 1 Give me an example of a I,Jerformar1ce' Okay. __ j :radio. TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 167 1 q. .So let's sax-there was a performcmce of a specific song in a venue i!l J:,os An~eles that:· 3 infringed a copyright that warner/chappellowned. ·. 4 What would ASCAP do?,' 5 6 MS. LeMOINE:\ Ob]ection to. the . extent it calls for speculation. 7 But you can answer. 8 THE WITNESS: · tn ·general terms, ·AS CAP 9 licenses venues that are including (so 10 their public presentation. 11. action a~ainst theveiJ.U.e tg either try to g:et. them' 12: licensed or address th,e issue 13' standpoint .• 14 BY MS. MANIFOLD: 15 Q •. they woul(l pursue) from a. ieg~i: So you would anticipate that ASCAP would: :file a lawsuit against the venue?: MS. LeMOINE: 18 calls for speculation. 19 Tim WITNESS: (o:b]ec:t~on to the extent it • 20 Yeah, I'm not -aware of what' their speci:Eic internal t:Jractices would be,, ., ... - ·~·-· .... ·····~~. -· ·- ..... 21 know it would be handled by_,t:tl_em since 22 those rights on our but I) ~~····~····~··~~····-· 'tl1E:X repr_esent' behalf~) BY MS. MANIFOLD: Q~ · 25 •. So when you say "handle, " what are the options that ASCAP does to handle them other than. TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 168 1 .talk to the venue and sayyou need to pay for tlie 2 license? 3 4 .5 A. My understanding is that they work to obtain: an executed license with the venue, and if that .c:an' t) . -'--. be done, they pursue action against the venue.' ~----- ' "Q. -: )ill_cl what type of action would that be? 7 A. r . couldn't: 8. Q. ·Generally?! 9 A. I would think that they make a claim against'; 6 \ 10 speak specificaiiy. ·them.· 11 Q. And how? 12 A. I'm not knowledgeable about those specifics. 13 14 MS. MANIFOLD: 17 Want to step out for a second. 15 16 Okay. (Recess from 3:45p.m. to 4:00p.m.) BY MS. MANIFOLD: Q. You said that ASCAP and Warner/Chappell 18 share intellectual property interests; is that 19 correct? I don't want to misstate your testimony. 20 A. I'm sorry. 21 Q. I believe you stated that ASCAP and Could you say that again? 22 Warner /Chappell, quote, share Interest in 23 intellectual property. • 24 25 A. I think I said they share an interest in. protecting intellectual property· rig-hts. TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 rsince ASCAP Page 169 its membe!s, 1 is ownedby 2 and songwriters, the organization is owned by the 3 verypeople that created that intellectual property 4 and -- and hope to license i t and collect ont::J:io-se 5 licenses. 6 /Q. which consists of publishers So other than an organizati()I1 set up to_ 7 .protect the rights, ASCAPdoesn't own anyspecific.· 8 interest in any song or any performance rights or_ '.9 anything like that? 10. 11 MS. LeMOINE:·. :()l:Jje:ction calls for a -~e~al conclusion. - ........ ---·. 12 But }'OU_can answer. 13 •THE WITNESS:· I haven't analyzed the i4 specific contract that a songw:dt~r signs 15 or that a publisher does, so I couldn't S];Jeak to the 16 legal: 17 those. rights on our behalf. 18 BY MS. MANIFOLD: 19 20 Q. with ASCAP But the:y are there as our agent licensing-) Have you reviewed any of the ASCAP agreements between Warner/Chappell and ASCAP? 21 A. I have not. 22 Q. Have you ever seen an agreement between 23 Warner 24 AS CAP? 25 A. between a publishing agent or artist and I I I I haven't looked at in detail. In my time I ~....,, __:=_::::_:-::_--=---=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=---=---=--=-=-=--=-=--=-=-=·-=-=-=--=--~=-=·=----=-=-=-=--·=-=-=-==-··=·=·= =---===--=-=======~ ___ -· TSG Reporting- Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 170 1 in BMI before I came to Warner/Chappell, part of my 2 responsibility was helping affiliate those contracts. 3 I can't say that I've analyzed in detail or looked at 4 an ASCAP affiliation agreement, which I wouldn't be 5 qualified to do. 6 7 Q. When was the last time you spoke to somebody at ASCAP? 8 A. Earlier this week. 9 Q. When was the last time you communicated with 10 somebody at ASCAP in terms of writing something, 11 paper? 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 A. week. In terms -- I met with them in person last E-mailed late last week. Q. And what was the nature of the information that you e-mailed? A. It was related to questions around specific song registrations that we filed with them. Q. Okay. MS. LeMOINE: I have one clarification, 20 which is I want to make sure the testimony is clear 21 that you testified. 22 23 24 25 MS. MANIFOLD: You're not allowed to clarify the witness's testimony. MS. LeMOINE: I think it's important because he's testifying other than as -- with counsel. TSG Reporting· Worldwide 877·702·9580 You Page 171 1 asked him about membership agreements, and I just 2 wanted to make sure it's other than with counsel. 3 MS. MANIFOLD: Okay. I don't understand the 4 clarification, but whatever you said on the record 5 you said on the record. 6 7 Okay. Thank you for your time today, Mr. Blietz. 8 MS. LeMOINE: 9 MS. MANIFOLD: 10 11 12 Thank you. Appreciate it. MS. LeMOINE: Off the record. (Deposition concluded at 4:03p.m.) * * * 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting· Worldwide 877· 702·9580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?