Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 365

APPLICATION to file document Defendants' Application To File Unredacted Reply Brief Regarding Response To Class Counsel's Billing Records Under Seal under seal filed by Defendant Warner Chappell Music Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Redacted Document Defendants [Redacted] Reply Brief Regarding Response To Class Counsels Billing Records, # 3 Declaration of Kelly Klaus in Support of Application)(Klaus, Kelly)

1 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 112503)
[e-mail]
2 KELLY M. KLAUS (State Bar No. 161091)
[e-mail]
3 ADAM I. KAPLAN (State Bar No. 268182)
[e-mail]
4 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue
5 Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
6 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
7
Attorneys for Defendants
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION

11
12 GOOD MORNING TO YOU
PRODUCTIONS CORP.; et al.,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.,
16 et al.,
17

Defendants.

Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK
(MRWx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION TO
FILE REPLY BRIEF REGARDING
RESPONSE TO CLASS COUNSEL’S
BILLING RECORDS UNDER SEAL
Courtroom:
Judge:

650
Hon. George H. King,

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFS.’ APPLICATION
TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK

1

Defendants have submitted an application requesting permission to file under

2 seal Defendants’ Unredacted Reply Regarding Response to Class Counsel’s Billing
3 Records.
4

[ALTERNATIVE ORDER 1: Based on Defendants’ Application, and good

5 cause appearing therefor, Defendants’ Application is GRANTED, and the following
6 document shall be filed under seal:
7

Defendants’ Unredacted and Under Seal Reply Brief Regarding Response to

8 Class Counsel’s Billing Records.]
9

[ALTERNATIVE ORDER 2: Class Counsel shall file, within seven days of

10 the date of this Order, a response of no more than five pages to Defendants’
11 Application. Class Counsel shall either (a) state that they do not object to the filing
12 of Defendants’ Reply Brief in the public record and the unsealing of Defendants’
13 opening brief and exhibits (Dkt. No. 361), or (b) explain why good cause exists to
14 maintain all or part of Defendants’ filings under seal while Class Counsel’s brief
15 (Dkt. No. 364) in its entirety is in the public record.]
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18 DATED: ________

________________________________________

19

THE HONORABLE GEORGE H. KING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22

Respectfully submitted by:

23
24

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

25 By:
26

/s/ Kelly M. Klaus
KELLY M. KLAUS

27 Attorneys for Defendants
28
-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFS.’ APPLICATION
TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK