Ruth Smith v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
Filing
26
ORDER FOR MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT AND OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT AND MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Manuel L. Real: Court GRANTS plaintiff's motion to remand, DENIES plaintiff's request for sanctions, DENIES defendant's motion to dismiss as moot and remanding case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number BC511333 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 Letter Remand to State Court) (pj)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
SOUTHERN DIVISION
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
(714) 338-4750
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRY NAFISI
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 328-4450
Date: October 1, 2013
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
111 N Hill Street
Los Angeles, Ca 90012
Re: Case Number: 2:13-cv-05340-R-PJW
Previously Superior Court Case No. BC511333
Case Name: Ruth Smith v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on September 30, 2013
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Court.
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: P. Lopez phyllis_lopez@cacd.uscourts.gov
Deputy Clerk
213-894-
G Western
✘
G Eastern
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
By:
Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?