John Doe v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc et al
Filing
21
ORDER GRANTING PLAITNIFFS MOTION TO REMAND 13 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The Court has no jurisdiction over this action and does not reach Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Said motion is VACATED 12 . The matter is remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court, Central District, Case No. BC 516756. cc: order, docket, remand letter to Los Angeles Superior Court, No. BC 516756. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated). (Attachments: # 1 remand letter). (lc). Modified on 11/19/2013 (lc).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
SOUTHERN DIVISION
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
(714) 338-4750
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRY NAFISI
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 328-4450
Date 11/19/13
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT
CIVIL FILING UNIT
111 NORTH HILL STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
Re: Case Number: 2:13-cv-06436-DDP-ASx
Previously Superior Court Case No. BC516756
Case Name: John Doe v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc et al
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on 11/19/13
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Court.
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: L Chai
Deputy Clerk
G Western
✘
213-894-5730
G Eastern
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
By:
Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?