Martin Beam v. Lori Green et al
Filing
6
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SUA SPONTE REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT by Judge Manuel L. Real A district court must remand a case to state court if at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. As such, this case is now REMANDED TO STATE COURT. to Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 Letter Remand To State Court) (pj)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MAKE JS-6
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
Case No.
CV-14-2692-R
Date: APRIL 14, 2014
Title: MARTIN BEAM -V- LORI GREEN et al
==========================================================================
PRESENT: HONORABLE MANUEL L. REAL, JUDGE
William Horrell
Courtroom Deputy
None Present
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None
PROCEEDINGS:
None
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SUA SPONTE REMANDING ACTION TO
STATE COURT
A district court must remand a case to state court “if at any time
before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject
matter jurisdiction.” 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Because this is an unlawful
detainer action, a federal question does not present itself. See
Indymac Federal Bank, F.S.B. v. Ocampo, No. CV 09-2337, 2010 WL
234828, *2 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2010) (sua sponte remanding an action
to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiff’s
complaint contained only an unlawful detainer claim). As such,
this case is now REMANDED TO STATE COURT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
cc: counsel of record
MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL -- GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk ___WH____
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?