Mayra Casas v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC et al
Filing
107
ORDER FINALLY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND ENTERING JUDGMENT DISMISSING THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit) (mrgo)
EXHIBIT 2
to [Proposed] Order Finally Approving Class
Action Settlement and Entering Judgment
EXHIBIT 2
to [Proposed] Order Finally Approving Class
Action Settlement and Entering Judgment
LORI A. BOWMAN, CA Bar No. 114664
lori.bowman@ogletreedeakins.com
2 JENNIFER L. KATZ, CA Bar No. 258917
jennifer.katz@ogletreedeakins.com
3 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200
4 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: 213.239.9800 | Facsimile: 213.239.9045
1
5
Attorneys for Defendant
6 VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES, LLC
7 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP
Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. [SBN 090058]
8 ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com
Stephen P. O’Dell, Esq. [SBN 132279]
9 sodell@marlinsaltzman.com
29800 Agoura Road, Suite 210
10 Agoura Hills, California 91301
Phone: (818) 991-8080 | Fax: (818) 991-8081
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12 MAYRA CASAS and JULIO FERNANDEZ
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
MAYRA CASAS, JULIO
16 FERNANDEZ, individuals, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly
17 situated,
18
19
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 2:14-CV-06412 GW (VBKx)
FIRST ADDENDUM TO JOINT
STIPULATION RE: CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT
20
Dist. Judge:
Mag. Judge:
23
Complaint Filed:
First Amended
Complaint Filed:
Second Amended
Complaint Filed:
Third Amended
Complaint Filed:
February 13, 2015
Trial Date:
None Set
VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES,
21 LLC, a business entity of unknown
form, LIMITED BRANDS, a business
22 entity of unknown form, and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,
24
25
26
Defendants.
Hon. George H. Wu
Hon. Victor B. Kenton
July 9, 2014
September 5, 2014
December 29, 2014
27
28
1
Case No. 2:14-CV-06412 GW (VBKx)
FIRST ADDENDUM TO JOINT STIPULATION RE: CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
2
TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
3
This First Addendum to Joint Stipulation re: Class Action Settlement
4
(hereinafter, “Addendum”) is made and entered into by and between plaintiffs Mayra
5
Casas (“Casas”) and Julio Fernandez (“Fernandez”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”),
6
on behalf of themselves and on behalf of others similarly situated; and defendant
7
Victoria’s Secret Stores, LLC (“Defendant”), hereinafter collectively referred to as
8
the “Parties.”
9
Subject to the approval of the Court, the Action is being compromised and
10
settled pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Joint Stipulation re: Class
11
Action Settlement (the “Settlement Agreement”) previously filed with this Court as
12
Exhibit A to the Saltzman Declaration filed in support of the Motion for Preliminary
13
Approval (Docket No. 80-1), and the terms of this Addendum thereto.
14
Settlement shall be binding on Plaintiffs and the class they purport to represent,
15
Defendant, and on their respective counsel, subject to the terms and conditions of the
16
Settlement Agreement, this Addendum thereto, and the approval of the Court.
This
17
By way of this First Addendum to the Joint Stipulation re: Class Action
18
Settlement, THE PARTIES HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATE AND AGREE as
19
follows:
20
1.
21
follows:
22
23
24
25
26
Class Definition: The Class Definition shall be amended to read as
“Class Members” shall mean all current and former employees of
Defendant, who worked in California during the Class Period and who
were classified as non-exempt from overtime pay, excluding Defendant,
its owners, directors, officers, executives, and all management personnel
whose responsibility it was to maintain and/or enforce the policies,
procedures, customs and/or business practices complained of in the
Action.
27
28
Additionally, a Subclass shall be formed to represent all members of the
foregoing Class whose employment with Defendants terminated during
2
Case No. 2:14-CV-06412 GW (VBKx)
FIRST ADDENDUM TO JOINT STIPULATION RE: CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
2
3
4
the Class Period.
As used hereinabove, the term “Class Period” means the time frame
commencing four years prior to the date the original Complaint in this
action was filed, i.e., July 9, 2010, and continuing until the date of
preliminary approval.
5
6
2.
Distribution Amendment: In recognition of the inclusion of the
7
“former employees” subclass set forth above in Paragraph 1, the Parties agree to
8
amend the distribution formula so as to afford compensation to the members of the
9
“former employees” subclass, to reflect their entitlement to a share of the
10
contemplated Labor Code Section 203 payment built into the Settlement. Given the
11
value attributed thereto, the Parties hereby agree to increase the proportionate share
12
payable to each of the members of the “former employees” subclass by increasing
13
the value of each such subclass member’s share by a factor of 1.05 percent, such that
14
a five percent (5%) increase in each such share will be allocated to said claim. The
15
Settlement Administrator will be responsible for performing the necessary
16
calculations to effectuate this increased proportional payment.
17
18
3.
Financial Impact of Opt-Out Allocations: With regard to the impact
19
of any and all persons who elect to exercise their right to “opt out” of the Settlement,
20
pursuant to the terms of Paragraphs 11 and 19(d) of the Settlement Agreement, it is
21
hereby agreed that consistent with the intended “non-reversionary” terms of this
22
Settlement, that any and all funds previously designated towards payment to any and
23
all “opt-outs” shall become part of the Net Settlement Amount, and therefore
24
available for proportional distribution to the participating Class Members.
25
26
27
4.
Injunction Term: The Parties hereby agree to delete, in its entirety,
Paragraph 21(e) of the Settlement Agreement.
28
3
Case No. 2:14-CV-06412 GW (VBKx)
FIRST ADDENDUM TO JOINT STIPULATION RE: CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?