Stephan Brooks v. Paco-Michelle Atwood et al

Filing 65

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that: (1) the Moving Defendants&# 039; Motion to Dismiss is granted; (2) the Second Amended Complaint and the action as against the Moving Defendants is dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice as to the federal claims against those Defendants; and (3) the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims against the Moving Defendants and those state law claims against the Moving Defendants are dismissed without prejudice. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (sp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

STEPHAN BROOKS, et al.,

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
PACO-MICHELLE ATWOOD, et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)

NO. CV 15-7724-JFW(E)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17
18

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed all of

19

the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of

20

United States Magistrate Judge.

21

de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to

22

which any objections have been made.

23

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

Further, the Court has engaged in a

The Court accepts and adopts the

24
25

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Moving Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

26

is granted; (2) the Second Amended Complaint and the action as against

27

the Moving Defendants is dismissed without leave to amend and with

28

prejudice as to the federal claims against those Defendants; and

1

(3) the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the

2

state law claims against the Moving Defendants and those state law

3

claims against the Moving Defendants are dismissed without prejudice.

4
5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve forthwith a copy of

6

this Order and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation on

7

Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.

8
9

DATED: January 5, 2017.

10
11
12
13

_______________________________
JOHN F. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2