Bradley James Much v. Michael Langston

Filing 60

MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS AGAINST DR. AZAD KURKJIAN AND DR. HIRUY GESSESSE BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(m) FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY SERVE THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order why the Magistrate Judge should not recommend that his claims against Dr. Kurkjian and Dr. Gessesse be dismissed for failure to serve these Defendants within the period prescribed by Rule 4(m). (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Dismissal Form (Blank)) (mz)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NUMBER

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Defendant(s).

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT
TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: (Check one)
G This action is dismissed by the Plaintiff(s) in its entirety.
G The Counterclaim brought by Claimant(s)
dismissed by Claimant(s) in its entirety.

is

G The Cross-Claim brought by Claimants(s)
dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety.

is

G The Third-party Claim brought by Claimant(s)
dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety.

is

G ONLY Defendant(s)
is/are dismissed from (check one) G Complaint, G Counterclaim, G Cross-claim, G Third-Party Claim
brought by

.

The dismissal is made pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a) or (c).

Date

Signature of Attorney/Party

NOTE: F.R.Civ.P. 41(a): This notice may be filed at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for
summary judgment, whichever first occurs.
F.R.Civ.P. 41(c): Counterclaims, cross-claims & third-party claims may be dismissed before service of a responsive
pleading or prior to the beginning of trial.

CV-09 (03/10)

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c)