Emanuel Lewis Boone v. Los Angeles County Sheriff Dept. et al

Filing 46

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not completed service of process, provided information to allow the U.S. Marshals Service to effectuate service, or requested an extension of time in which to do so supported by good cause. Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before September 27, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed as to defendants Delia Cruz and Maurice R. Joliff for failure to complete timely service. (Attachments: # 1 Voluntary Dismissal Form) (mkr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

2:16-cv-01898-SVW (SK)

Title

Emanuel Lewis Boone v. Jerry Hadnot, et al.

Present: The Honorable

Date

September 13, 2017

Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Marc Krause

n/a

Deputy Clerk

Court Smart / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None present

None present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff received an extension of time to September 1, 2017, to complete service of
process on two remaining unserved defendants, Delia Cruz and Maurice R. Joliff. (ECF No.
45). Plaintiff was advised of his responsibility to provide sufficient information to allow the
U.S. Marshals Service to complete service on these defendants. As of the date of this order,
Plaintiff has not completed service of process, provided information to allow the U.S. Marshals
Service to effectuate service, or requested an extension of time in which to do so supported by
good cause.
Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before September 27,
2017, why this action should not be dismissed as to defendants Delia Cruz and Maurice R.
Joliff for failure to complete timely service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff may also
voluntarily dismiss defendants Delia Cruz and Maurice R. Joliff using the attached Notice of
Dismissal form.
Plaintiff is advised that the failure to file a timely response to this Order
may result in involuntary dismissal of this action for failure to comply with a
court order and failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R. 41-1.

CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1