Susana Lazos v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this order, the decision of the Commissioner is r eversed and remanded for further proceedings to (1) reconsider Dr. Spayde's opinion and a sit/stand option; (2) reconsider Dr. Caruso-Radin's opinion that Lazos is limited to simple, two-step instructions; and (3) reconsider Dr. Kaiser's opinion. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (mp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SUSANA LAZOS,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 16-3405-AGR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AND ORDER
17
18
19
20
On March 13, 2017, this court issued a Report and Recommendation in this
action. (Dkt. Nos. 17-18.)
21
On March 14, 2017, Plaintiff filed a statement of consent to proceed before the
22
magistrate judge. (Dkt. No. 19.) Defendant had previously filed a consent. (Dkt. No.
23
11.) The action was reassigned to this court for all further proceedings. (Dkt. No. 20.)
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation now becomes the opinion and
order of this court.
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the report and
2
recommendation, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this order, the decision
3
of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further proceedings to (1)
4
reconsider Dr. Spayde’s opinion and a sit/stand option; (2) reconsider Dr. Caruso-
5
Radin’s opinion that Lazos is limited to simple, two-step instructions; and (3) reconsider
6
Dr. Kaiser’s opinion.
7
8
9
10
DATED: March 28, 2017
ALICIA G. ROSENBERG
United States Magistrate Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?