Susana Lazos v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this order, the decision of the Commissioner is r eversed and remanded for further proceedings to (1) reconsider Dr. Spayde's opinion and a sit/stand option; (2) reconsider Dr. Caruso-Radin's opinion that Lazos is limited to simple, two-step instructions; and (3) reconsider Dr. Kaiser's opinion. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (mp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SUSANA LAZOS, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 16-3405-AGR MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 17 18 19 20 On March 13, 2017, this court issued a Report and Recommendation in this action. (Dkt. Nos. 17-18.) 21 On March 14, 2017, Plaintiff filed a statement of consent to proceed before the 22 magistrate judge. (Dkt. No. 19.) Defendant had previously filed a consent. (Dkt. No. 23 11.) The action was reassigned to this court for all further proceedings. (Dkt. No. 20.) 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation now becomes the opinion and order of this court. 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the report and 2 recommendation, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this order, the decision 3 of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further proceedings to (1) 4 reconsider Dr. Spayde’s opinion and a sit/stand option; (2) reconsider Dr. Caruso- 5 Radin’s opinion that Lazos is limited to simple, two-step instructions; and (3) reconsider 6 Dr. Kaiser’s opinion. 7 8 9 10 DATED: March 28, 2017 ALICIA G. ROSENBERG United States Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?