Juan Pablo Paniagua v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 30

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that: (1) the decision of the Social Security Administration is reversed in part; and (2) the matter is remanded for further administrative action consistent with the Report and Recommendation. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (sp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 JUAN PABLO PANIAGUA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) NO. CV 16-3513-E ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(1)(B), the Court has 19 reviewed the pleadings and other papers herein along with the attached 20 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. 21 Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions 22 of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been 23 made. 24 Recommendation. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 25 26 IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the decision of the Social Security 27 Administration is reversed in part; and (2) the matter is remanded for 28 further administrative action consistent with the Report and 1 Recommendation. 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve forthwith a copy 4 of this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and 5 the Judgment on Plaintiff, counsel for Plaintiff and the United States 6 Attorney for the Central District of California. 7 8 DATED: February 13, 2017. 9 10 11 12 /s/ CHARLES F. EICK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?