Juan Pablo Paniagua v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
30
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that: (1) the decision of the Social Security Administration is reversed in part; and (2) the matter is remanded for further administrative action consistent with the Report and Recommendation. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (sp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
JUAN PABLO PANIAGUA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
)
SECURITY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)
NO. CV 16-3513-E
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(1)(B), the Court has
19
reviewed the pleadings and other papers herein along with the attached
20
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.
21
Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions
22
of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been
23
made.
24
Recommendation.
The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
25
26
IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the decision of the Social Security
27
Administration is reversed in part; and (2) the matter is remanded for
28
further administrative action consistent with the Report and
1
Recommendation.
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve forthwith a copy
4
of this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and
5
the Judgment on Plaintiff, counsel for Plaintiff and the United States
6
Attorney for the Central District of California.
7
8
DATED: February 13, 2017.
9
10
11
12
/s/
CHARLES F. EICK
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?