Mark Vincent Straus v. Shawn Hatton
Filing
10
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. On May 8, 2017, Petitioner, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus ("Petition") pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2254 challenging his 1998 conviction and sentence. (Dkt. No. 1.) Petitioner shall receive one final opportunity to file a First Amended Petition. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than October 10, 2017, Petitioner shall fi le either: (1) a First Amended Petition that complies with the Court's May 16, 2017 Order; or (2) a signed application for an enlargement of time and competent evidence, such as a declaration signed under penalty of perjury, demonstrating good cause for such an extension. Alternatively, if Petitioner does not wish to proceed with this action at this time, he may file a signed document entitled Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal and the action will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.(SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Dismissal) (gr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.
Title
CV 17-3461-JVS (KS)
Date: September 20, 2017
Mark Vincent Straus v. Shawn Hatton
Present: The Honorable:
Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge
Roxanne Horan-Walker
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL
On May 8, 2017, Petitioner, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition
For Writ Of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his 1998
conviction and sentence. (Dkt. No. 1.) On May 16, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show
Cause why the action should not be dismissed as untimely and ordered Petitioner to file, no later
than June 15, 2017, a First Amended Petition that, inter alia, included specific factual allegations
demonstrating that either the Petition was timely under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1) or that Petitioner
diligently pursued his rights but was prevented from timely filing the Petition by an
extraordinary circumstance. (Dkt. No. 3.)
Petitioner sought and received two extensions of time to comply with the Court’s May
16, 2017 Order, ultimately extending his deadline for filing a First Amended Petition to August
27, 2017. (Dkt. Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9.) However, more than two weeks have now passed since
Petitioner’s First Amended Petition was due, and Petitioner has neither filed the First Amended
Petition nor otherwise communicated with the Court about his case. Accordingly, the action is
now subject to dismissal under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. However, in
the interests of justice, Petitioner shall receive one final opportunity to file a First Amended
Petition. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than October 10, 2017,
Petitioner shall file either:
(1) a First Amended Petition that complies with the Court’s May 16, 2017 Order; or
(2) a signed application for an enlargement of time and competent evidence, such as a
declaration signed under penalty of perjury, demonstrating good cause for such an
extension
CV-90 (03/15)
Civil Minutes – General
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.
Title
CV 17-3461-JVS (KS)
Date: September 20, 2017
Mark Vincent Straus v. Shawn Hatton
Alternatively, if Petitioner does not wish to proceed with this action at this time, he may
file a signed document entitled “Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal” and the action will be dismissed
without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Petitioner is advised that his failure to timely comply with this Order will result in a
recommendation to dismiss this case for failure to prosecute and comply with court orders
pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 41-1.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (03/15)
Civil Minutes – General
rh
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?