Stephanie Clifford v. Keith Davidson et al

Filing 1

NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number SC129384 Receipt No: 0973-21885105 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Michael Cohen. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Brent H Blakely added to party Michael Cohen(pty:dft))(Blakely, Brent)

Download PDF
1 Brent H. Blakely (CA Bar No. 157292) BLAKELY LAW GROUP 1334 Parkview Avenue, Suite 280 3 Manhattan Beach, California 90266 Telephone: (310) 546-7400 4 Facsimile: (310) 546-7401 5 Email: BBlakely@BlakelyLawGroup.com 2 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 MICHAEL COHEN 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 11 12 STEPHANIE CLIFFORD (AKA 13 STORMY DANIELS), an individual, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 v. 17 KEITH M. DAVIDSON, an individual, MICHAEL COHEN, an individual, and 18 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive 19 20 Case No. SC129384 [Assigned to the Hon. Craig D. Karlan, Dept. N] DEFENDANT MICHAEL COHEN’ S NOTICE TO THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT AND ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) DIVERSITY Defendants. 21 22 Complaint Filed: June 6, 2018 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1NOTICE TO CLERK AND ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL 1 TO THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND TO ALL OTHER PARTIES: 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on June 7, 2018, this action was removed to 4 the United States District Court, Central District of California, Western Division, 5 located at 350 W. 1st Street, Suite 4311, Los Angeles, California 90012. True and 6 correct copies of the Notice of Removal of Action, Civil Cover Sheet and Notice of 7 Interested Parties are attached hereto as Exhibits A, B and C, respectively. 8 9 DATED: June 6, 2018 BLAKELY LAW GROUP 10 11 12 13 By: BRENT H. BLAKELY Attorneys for Defendant MICHAEL COHEN 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2NOTICE TO CLERK AND ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?