Martin Seanz Salcido v. R. C. Johnson et al
Filing
28
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Otis D. Wright re 24 . The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that: (1) Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the Second Amended Complaint and the action without leave to amend and with prejudice. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (sp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
MARTIN SEANZ SALCIDO,
) NO. CV 19-9259-ODW(E)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
)
R.C. JOHNSON, ET AL.,
)
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
)
Defendants.
)
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
______________________________)
16
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the
19
Second Amended Complaint, all of the records herein and the attached
20
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.
21
the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the
22
Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made.
23
Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
24
Recommendation.
Further,
25
The
26
IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff’s request for appointment of
27
counsel is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the
28
Second Amended Complaint and the action without leave to amend and
1
with prejudice.
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve forthwith a copy of
4
this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the
5
Judgment of this date on Plaintiff.
6
7
DATED: September 8, 2020.
8
9
10
_______________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?