Martin Seanz Salcido v. R. C. Johnson et al

Filing 28

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Otis D. Wright re 24 . The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that: (1) Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the Second Amended Complaint and the action without leave to amend and with prejudice. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (sp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 MARTIN SEANZ SALCIDO, ) NO. CV 19-9259-ODW(E) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) R.C. JOHNSON, ET AL., ) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ) Defendants. ) OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ______________________________) 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the 19 Second Amended Complaint, all of the records herein and the attached 20 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. 21 the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the 22 Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. 23 Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 24 Recommendation. Further, 25 The 26 IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff’s request for appointment of 27 counsel is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the 28 Second Amended Complaint and the action without leave to amend and 1 with prejudice. 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve forthwith a copy of 4 this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the 5 Judgment of this date on Plaintiff. 6 7 DATED: September 8, 2020. 8 9 10 _______________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?