Public Guardian Conservator for San Bernardino County Conservator for Thomas W Lee Jr v. Mari Torres et al

Filing 3

ORDER SUMMARILY REMANDING IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION by Judge George H. King. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6) (Attachments: # 1 CV-103) (ad)

Download PDF
,- 1 FILED CLERK U.S. DISTR!_G.T COIJR1 2 OEC I 8 2.013 3 CENTRAL 4 BY 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 13 PUBLIC GUARDIAN CONSERVATOR FORSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CONSERVATOR FOR THOMAS W. LEE JR., 14 Plaintiff, 12 15 16 Case No. EDCV 13-2210-UA (DUTYx) ORDER SUMMARILY REMANDING IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION vs. MARl TORRES, ET AL, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 The Court will remand this unlawful detainer action to state court summarily because it has been removed improperly. 21 On December 3, 2013, defendant Mari Torres, having been sued in what 22 appears to be a routine unlawful detainer action in California state court, lodged a 23 Notice of Removal of that action to this Court and also presented an application to 24 proceed in forma pauperis. The Court has denied the latter application under separate 25 cover because the action was not properly removed. To prevent the action from 26 remaining in jurisdictional limbo, the Court issues this Order to remand the action to 27 state court. 28 III 1 1 Simply stated, plaintiff could not have brought this action in federal court in 2 the first place, in that defendant does not competently allege facts supplying either 3 diversity or federal-question jurisdiction, and therefore removal is improper. 28 4 U.S.C. §1441(a); see Exxon Mobil Corpv. Allapattah Svcs .. Inc., 545 U.S. 546,563, 5 125 S. Ct. 2611, 162 L. Ed. 2d 502 (2005). Even if complete diversity of citizenship 6 exists, the amount in controversy does not exceed the diversity-jurisdiction threshold 7 of$75,000. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441(b). On the contrary, the unlawful-detainer 8 complaint recites that the amount in controversy does not exceed $10,000. 9 10 Nor does plaintiffs unlawful detainer action raise any federal legal question. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1441(b). 11 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that (1) this matter be REMANDED to the 12 Superior Court of California, San Bernardino County, 17780 Arrow Blvd., Fontana, 13 CA 92335, forlack ofsubjectmatter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c); (2) 14 that the Clerk send a certified copy of this Order to the state court; and (3) that the 15 Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 DATED: 20 21 ~~ 24 25 Presented by: J./ ffL David T. Bristow United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?