Jacoby Deshon Hildredth v. W. S. Pliler

Filing 3

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Habeas Rules, the Court has conducted a preliminary review of the Petition and finds it appears subject to dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Petitioner is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing within thirty (30) days of this Order explaining why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Attachments: #1 Blank Ntc of Dismissal) (mba)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jacoby Deshon Hildredth,

CASE NUMBER

5:20-cv-01667-DOC-JDE
Plaintiff(s),

v.

W. S. Pliler,

Defendant(s).

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT
TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: (Check one)
G This action is dismissed by the Plaintiff(s) in its entirety.
G The Counterclaim brought by Claimant(s)
dismissed by Claimant(s) in its entirety.

is

G The Cross-Claim brought by Claimants(s)
dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety.

is

G The Third-party Claim brought by Claimant(s)
dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety.

is

G ONLY Defendant(s)
is/are dismissed from (check one) G Complaint, G Counterclaim, G Cross-claim, G Third-Party Claim
brought by

.

The dismissal is made pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a) or (c).

Date

Signature of Attorney/Party

NOTE: F.R.Civ.P. 41(a): This notice may be filed at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for
summary judgment, whichever first occurs.
F.R.Civ.P. 41(c): Counterclaims, cross-claims & third-party claims may be dismissed before service of a responsive
pleading or prior to the beginning of trial.

CV-09 (03/10)

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c)