Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al

Filing 115

STIPULATION to Reschedule Time to Reopen Case filed by Plaintiffs Mike Campbell, Don Henley, Danny Kortchmar. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Charlesworth, Jacqueline)

Download PDF
Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al Doc. 115 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP JACQUELINE C. CHARLESWORTH (pro hac vice) JCharlesworth@mofo.com CRAIG B. WHITNEY (CA SBN 217673) CWhitney@mofo.com 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 Telephone: 212.468.8000 Facsimile: 212.468.7900 PAUL GOLDSTEIN (CA SBN 79613) PGoldstein@mofo.com 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, California 94305-8610 Telephone: 650.723.0313 Facsimile: 650.327.0811 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ONE LLP CHRISTOPHER W. ARLEDGE (CA SBN 200767) CArledge@onellp.com JOHN TEHRANIAN (CA SBN 211616) JTehranian@onellp.com 4000 MacArthur Blvd. West Tower, Suite 1100 Newport Beach, California 92660 Telephone: 949.502.2870 Facsimile: 949.258.5081 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DON HENLEY, MIKE CAMPBELL and DANNY KORTCHMAR, v. Plaintiffs, Case No. SACV09-0481 JVS (RNBx) STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO REOPEN CASE CHARLES S. DEVORE and JUSTIN HART, Defendants. ny-932254 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, on July 9, 2010, the parties notified the Court that they had reached a settlement-in-principle, and requested a stay of all future deadlines in the case to allow the parties to finalize the settlement agreement; WHEREAS, on July 12, 2010, the Court dismissed the action in its entirety without prejudice to the right, upon good cause being shown within forty-five (45) days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated; WHEREAS the parties' settlement-in-principle contemplates that Defendants will have sixty (60) days from the date of execution to pay Plaintiffs the full settlement amount; WHEREAS the parties' settlement-in-principle further contemplates that a final dismissal of the action (i.e., without the right to reopen the case) will not occur until Plaintiffs have received the full settlement amount; and WHEREAS the parties anticipate executing a settlement agreement and obtaining all necessary signatures within the next two to three weeks; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record, subject to the Court's approval, that the parties have the right, upon good cause being shown within ninety (90) days, to reopen the action if settlement is not finalized and the full settlement amount is not paid. 1 ny-932254 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 14, 2010 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Jacqueline C. Charlesworth Craig B. Whitney Paul Goldstein By: /s/ Jacqueline C. Charlesworth Jacqueline C. Charlesworth Attorneys for Plaintiffs DON HENLEY, MIKE CAMPBELL and DANNY KORTCHMAR Dated: July 14, 2010 ONE LLP Christopher W. Arledge Peter Afrasiabi John Tehranian By: /s/ Christopher W. Arledge Christopher W. Arledge Attorneys for Defendants CHARLES S. DEVORE and JUSTIN HART 2 ny-932254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?