Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al
Filing
145
DECLARATION of Katharine Dunn in opposition to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Protective Order for Postponing Depositions 141 and in support of Memorandum re Opposition to EX PARTE APPLICATION 144 filed by Plaintiff Bryan Pringle. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Hampton, George)
Dunn, Katharine N.
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dunn, Katharine N.
Thursday, June 23, 2011 8:48 AM
'Cenar, Kara'; Colin Holley
Righettini, Justin; Pink, Jonathan Stuart; Seale, Merili
RE: Confiding Batts depositions
Kara,
Our position now remains as it was before and during the call yesterday. The depositions are going
forward in the Pringle case. If the deponents do not appear for deposition in the Pringle case on July
22, 25, 26 and 27, we will seek appropriate sanctions.
Katharine
Katharine Dunn
Miller Canfield
Attorney at Law
312-460-4226 (direct)
312-460-4288 (fax)
dunn@millercanfield.com
www.millercanfield.com
-----Original Message----From: Cenar, Kara [mailto:Kara.Cenar@bryancave.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 7:30 AM
To: Dunn, Katharine N.; Colin Holley
Cc: Righettini, Justin; Pink, Jonathan Stuart; Seale, Merili
Subject: Confiding Batts depositions
Colin and Katharine
During our call yesterday you represented that you want the BEP dates for deposition in Batts
The earliest possible dates are July 22, 25, 26, and 28. Due to their tour schedule there is no other
earlier date.
I strongly encourage you to depose these witnesses for your Batts case because you claim you need to
take them for the Summary Judgment response Walter ordered you to provide.
Please advise me today as to whether these dates will be used for the Batts depositions.
Although we find it highly unlikely that you will take the seven hours with each of these witnesses
you can take them for the time required on those dates.
1
We will be providing alternative dates for Pringle depositions of our Band members and will be
seeking a protective order from the Court in Pringle. They are not available in August for
professional reasons, but discovery does not close in the Pringle matter until mid November so we
should find a date well before the close of discovery.
In the highly likely event that you complete your Batts depositions during the week of July 22-27, in
less than 7 hours for the witness, then the witnesses can be deposed in the Pringle case.on those same
days.
We will continue to try to schedule another day for witnesses in the Pringle matter but due to their
tour schedule it's not likely to be until the fall.
I understand from our call yesterday that you do not intend to have the band members appear for
depositions on the conflicting corona del mar dates and locations but you won't withdraw the
Notices. But your representation that you do not intend to take their depositions on those dates takes
them off calendar. We have taken them off our calendar.
Since we are giving you the first available dates for the Batts case depositions, jul 22, 25, 27,29 i
assume the motion to compel is Moot. Will you withdraw it?
We spoke during our meet and confer about our filing a motion for protective order we intend to file
with the Pringle Court to seek relief from the Notice of Deposition for the Band members. The band
members cannot appear for deposition on the dates noticed because they are being deposed in the
Batts case. They are willing to be deposed on that day for pringle too, as it is highly unlikely that the
Batts depositions will take a full seven hours.
We are presently scheduling other dates for them to appear for deposition in the Pringle matter.
Since they are in Europe on tour right now it might take a few weeks before I can confirm dates
Please let me know if we can handle the Pringle depositions in this manner by agreement, or whether
it is necessary to file our Motion for Protective Order.
Kara
This electronic message is from a law firm. It may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you received this transmission in error, please reply to the sender to advise of the error and delete
this transmission and any attachments.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform
you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties
under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party
any transaction or matter addressed herein.
bcllp2011
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?